Monday, September 19, 2005

Mayor Ray Nagin Endangers Citizens Of New Orleans - Again! So Why Is The LA Times Covering Up For Him?!

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/09/19/D8CNLNU80.html

Under pressure from President Bush and other top federal officials, the mayor suspended the reopening of large portions of the city Monday and instead ordered nearly everyone out because of the risk of a new round of flooding from a tropical storm on the way.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/20/national/nationalspecial/20orleans.html?hp&ex=1127275200&en=a144bd88eb48305d&ei=5094&partner=homepage

And in the New York Times...

The mayor reversed himself hours after Mr. Bush had questioned whether it was safe for residents to return. The president reiterated warnings by Vice Adm. Thad W. Allen of the Coast Guard, leader of the federal recovery effort, that the levee system was weakened, that the 911 emergency telephone system was not working, that the hospitals remained closed and that pollutants were in the air and water.

"Admiral Allen speaks for the administration," Mr. Bush said on Monday in Washington. "We have made our position loud and clear. The mayor needs to hear, and so do the people of New Orleans, our objective.

Now the Main Stream Media has mainly ignored Mayor Nagin's bizarre statements and behavior in the days before and after Katrina hit the city, other than his outburst when he complained - and rightly so - that no one else was doing their jobs properly. And the media has also largely ignored how he had to be forced by the president to even call for an evacuation of the city - or how he seemingly then did everything he could to prevent it from happening.

His most bizarre performance, though, was the morning before the storm when he gave a TV interview where he said that even with the then projected Category 5 direct hit - the storm water (which he claimed would not be polluted) would be totally gone, that all utilities restored and that life would be back to normal within one to two weeks. But don't look for a tape of that WWL-TV interview on-line. It has... vanished.

He also did nothing did nothing to help the evacuation and ignored the plan to use buses to get the poor out of the city. He also refused to implement any of the evacuation plans other then to tell people to go to shelters at the same time he pointedly said he would NOT stock them with food or water. And his idea of evacuating tourists was to tell them to go to the third floors of their hotels. Plus it has since come out that when AMTRAK offered Nagin an entire train on Sunday to evacuate people the day before the storm - he refused their offer.

And these are only some of the dozens of other things he said and did - and did not do - that are slowly coming out, but what you will rarely read about in the LA Times (or even the New York Times, though that is changing some) - much less hear on the network news shows.

But, finally, his behavior has become so delusional - that Associated Press and even the New York Times has finally begun to report his ravings, even though the LA Times still refuses to. In fact, even when the LAT uses AP source material, the LAT continues its history of editing and altering wire reports to meet the newpaper's political agenda.

First, as background, when Nagin, and to a lesser extend, Governor Blanco, were blamed for not following their own evacuation plans - each claimed that when Bush declared it a national emergency - two days before it hit - that he was the one in charge. And when things went wrong afterwards - they also each claimed that the president was the one in charge.

But now read below what Nagin is saying in the same New York Times article when Bush and other officials tried to stop him from having hundreds of thousands of people return to a city; a city with no safe water, no sewers, no sanitary facilites, limited power, deadly pools of standing water - and levees that could collapse with even a moderate rain storm, much less a hurricane or a tropical storm. Read the below quotes that LA Times won't report:

Noting that Admiral Allen had urged residents not to return, the mayor said: "The admiral's a good man. I respect him. But when he starts talking to the citizens of New Orleans, that's kind of out of his lane. There's only one mayor of New Orleans and I'm it.

And in an AP report:

Bush said White House chief of staff Andrew Card had been pressing the matter with Nagin. The concerns were also echoed by the top federal official in charge in New Orleans, Coast Guard Vice Adm. Thad Allen, who went on one news show after another to warn that city services may not be able to handle the influx of people.

And...

Before reversing course Monday, a clearly agitated Nagin snapped that Allen had apparently made himself "the new crowned federal mayor of New Orleans."

Now this is important because before the hurricane hit, the White House had seriously considered taking control of New Orleans to get the evacuation going, but decided against it, feeling the political problems would have been too great. And these problems are evident in Ray Nagin's willingness to put the lives of the citizens of his city at risk then and again now, and his refusal to listen to reason until - once again - he had to forced to stop putting people at risk.

Lastly, there are many quotes from Ray Nagin both just before and in the days after the hurricane (his ravings about the phantom helicopter that someone stopped from fixing the levee is my personal favorite - though there were some internet stories about him claiming kidnapping or assasination plots that I never botherd to confirm) that demonstrate he is... crackers.

But, again, don't look to read any of these quotes in the LA Times.

Sunday, September 18, 2005

More On LA Times Death Spiral!

http://slate.msn.com/id/2126102/&#lockyer

Mickey Kaus over at Kausfiles.com has a LA Times twofer today. First, he describes how the LA Times keeps sending bills to people they openly admit KNOW have canceled their subscriptions - seemingly in hope that they will pay the bills out of habit. As Mickey states - this is illegal as Hell! He even asks Attorney General Bill Lockyer to investigate.

But, of course, asking a politician who wants to seek higher office to investigate the LA Times has about the same odds of success as the odds that the LA Times will admit when it gets its facts wrong.

Second, Mickey relates how even the few people who still subscribe at a friend's apartment building - many of them don't even bother to pick up their papers as they step over them in the morning - and they end up getting thrown out!

Saturday, September 17, 2005

There Are Days When The Gods Smile Down On LA Cowboy!

Under the this is simply too good to be true category - the LA Times has FINALLY posted a mid-day weekend update at the top of its website. And even better than that - it's about a LOCAL news Story!

Well, kinda local...

Chicago Commuter Train Derails!

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/chi-050917derail,0,1125840.story?coll=la-home-headlines

1:35 PM PDT, September 17, 2005

From the Chicago Tribune

By Brendan McCarthy, Tribune staff reporter

A five-car Metra train derailed Saturday morning on an elevated track near 47th and Wentworth, killing one person and injuring more than more than 80 others.

The cause of the accident, which happened about 8:20 a.m., is unknown, said Metra spokeswoman Judy Pardonnet. The train was Rock Island District train No. 504 from south suburban Joliet going to the LaSalle Street station.

That's right kids!

A known terrorist threatens to bomb Los Angeles - and that tape is shown on national network TV and that still doesn't warrant an update on the LA Times website. But have a train derail on local Chicago transit - well - my God - let's stop the presses! People in LA need to know about that - immediately!

UPDATE!

5 PM - and in the entire known universe there is still not a single story worthy of adding to last night's LA Times website other than a Chicago commuter train derailing. Luckily, the New York Times website is chock filled with updates of actual news stories.

And, on other fronts, the names of Robert Wise's kids and granddaughter... are still 'unavailable' and the LA Times is still standing by Mike Davis' claim that the housing market in San Francisco has... crashed... while the Editorial Page still insists that only around 700 people died in San Francisco's 1906 fire/earthquake.

The Times' positions on the existence of the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny, however, still await a vote of the Editorial Board.

UPDATE!!

Bruins Kick Chicago's Transits Butt!

Well, actually, no. But they did bump the Chicago train accident off its place on the front page with the - unexpected UCLA - Yeah, Bruins! - win over the Sooners! But was this story staff written?

Please! Be serious! This is a... weekend. And no one works at the LA Times on weekends. It is - as usual - an AP story. It is also time stamped 4:46 - but it sure as hell was not on my server even at several minutes after 5 PM.

Friday, September 16, 2005

LA Times Pop-Up Ads Hit New Low! (And Update Explaining This Below!)

You know those annoying pop-up ads that cover over on-line news pages and you have to either outwait them or move them or click the 'x' to close them? Well, the LA Times in the final stages of its well deserved death rattle has gotten desperate enough to stoop to a new low, even by their standards.

They now have an on-line ad that not only does not go away by itself, but there is also no way to click past it, or even move it. You are FORCED to open the ad to read the article, giving the LA Times money each time you click it.

Now I am all in favor of using internet ad revenue to provide 'free' on-line editions of newspapers, but if the LA Times made even the slightest effort at updating its website or actually turned out a paper anyone would actually want to read, they would make a lot more money than by employing sleazy tactics like this.

Now as the ad seems to only come up when you first enter the site, just click to another story when it appears and then click back to the one you wanted to read, and the ad spam should be gone. Also, despite opening the LAT site a number of times today on differrent computers on different networks - I have only hit it twice this far. So it seems to be a trial balloon to see how much it annoys us.

In addition, on my oldest computer with no anti-pop-up software - I also get FOUR moveable pop-up ads besides this one when I first hit the website.

UPDATE AND ANSWER TO WHAT THE HELL THAT POP-UP IS!

Afer some experimenting, I have discovered how differently each browser downloads ads on the LA Times website. Some are pop-up hell and another has this HUGE Macy's ad that suddenly appears out of nowhere. And on one of them - FIREFOX - the Alaska Airlines ad somehow moves outside of its right hand side box and slides over, largely covering over the text. And then it can not be moved or closed without opening it. It does not do this on my other browsers.

So this is not a new type of pop-up - it is just a piece of rouge software.

LATER UPDATE 9/28/2005

LA Times on-line staff still working hard to fix this problem - which does not replicate on their computers - but does on several readers computers with even the latest FIREFOX. It appears to be something wrong with the Alaska Airlines software - and not a LAT problem. But as of last night, the ad is now almost totally back in its box.

The Moscow Cats Theater Rocks New York City!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/17/theater/newsandfeatures/17cats.html?hp&ex=1127016000&en=9158ce5823bcbe41&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Even though I've read past articles about the purported existence of The Moscow Cats Circus - I was still skeptical that it actually existed. And the below New York Times story... made me wonder even more if this was not all some grand hoax that the media has played along with:

The idea of performing cats came to Mr. Kuklachev in 1971, he said, when he found a stray begging for food by performing on its hind legs and doing somersaults for onlookers. Mr. Kuklachev, the son of a truck driver and a factory worker, had attended clown school. He realized he and the cat might be able to do something together. He named her Strelka, and soon she was performing with him at the Moscow State Circus.

And...

A cat called Tamara was brought out onstage and began rocking on a glittering pink rocking horse, nearly tipping over at one point. There would also be a "tightrope" act. Two people held a pole horizontally while Belok, who is white, walked across it, with an intent manner. A black cat named Charlie did the same thing, but upside down, grasping the pole from underneath with his four legs. Motia, who is off-white, outdid them both. She made her way across the pole from underneath using only two legs.

Ok. Like I'm really supposed to believe that any of this happend.

And all you cat owners out there - you can understand my... skepticism of these claims. But there are photos. Actual photos of actual cats performing actual tricks. And it's at the TriBeCa Performing Arts Center until October 30th. No word if it is coming to LA or otherwise touring.

Mark Winograd New Temp Planner for LA!

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2005/09/the_great_kinsley.html

The rumors were true! As Kevin over at LA Observed announced this afternoon, our new interim planner is Mark Winograd, best known for his exemplary work in Culver City.

Mayor Villaraigosa today named Mark Winogrond to be the city's interim planning director. Here's an interview with him in The Planning Report last year and the transcript of a roundtable with him at RAND, which called Winogrond "exemplar of a new breed of city planner passionately committed to improving local government." He was previously the CAO in Culver City and Community Development Director there and in Lawndale and West Hollywood.

What I like best about his work in Culver City is that not only did he revitalize downtown Culver City - yes, Culver City actually has one, but he also saved the historic fabric of the city, developed cultural facilities, including theaters, and even got the smallest details right, such as micro-landscaping in alleys.

This could be a good trial run for a possible permanent appointment.

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Final - I Promise! - Update On Power Outage!

The latest excuse, excuse me - reason - for the recent power outage was that it was all due to rogue paperwork!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dwp16sep16,1,7259438.story?coll=la-headlines-california

Patrick McGreevy
Times Staff Writer

September 16, 2005

An inaccurate work order led a crew to cut the lines that caused Monday's power outage to 2 million people in Los Angeles, the city's Department of Water and Power has determined.

"It was a case of miscommunication," Henry Martinez, an assistant general manager for the DWP, said Thursday.

DWP engineers who planned the replacement of a control system at a Toluca Lake receiving station specified that a bundle of three charged lines should be left intact, but work drawings handed to the crew called for the lines to be cut and removed, Martinez said.

The wire cutters used by the work crew closed a circuit between two live wires, triggering circuit breakers that shut down the receiving station and began the power outage, he said.

This also - finally - clarifies the confusion of whether it was the cutting of the wires that did the damage or if it was the worker then afterwards putting the wrong wires together. Now it appears that when the wire cutter cut through the insulation of the bundled wires - the metal implement is what closed the circuit between still live wires, thus making the cutting and the putting together of the wrong wires a simultaneous act.

Case closed!

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Director Robert Wise Dead At 91! LA Times Caught Flat Footed!

http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-wise15sep15,0,2850344.story?coll=la-home-headlines

OK - boys and girls - what is so very, very wrong with the very last sentence of a three page story about one of the last directors (Robert Wise) who worked in the 1930's/1940's glory days of Hollywood?

Wise's first wife, Patricia, whom he married in 1942, died in 1975. He married his second wife, Millicent, in 1977. She survives him. He is also survived by a son, a daughter and a granddaughter, whose names were not available at press time.

Not available at press time? Why? Hadn't his kids been given names by then? Were they still too afraid of identity theft?

I mean, like every newspaper on this planet keeps pre-written obits on file - so how could these very basic facts have been omitted? Seriously - this guy was freakin' ... 91... so it's not like this should have come as such a big shock to the Times. So how could they have not been better prepared?.

But, skipping over that, for the moment - the truly sad part is what this depressingly pathetic fact bodes for the City of Los Angeles. And that is... that even with all the people running and working at the LA Times - there wasn't a single person who knew the names of Robert Wise's kids or granddaughter.

OK - so that's not the end of the world - but it gets worse. Far worse. It also means that there also wasn't even a single person who knew anyone to call to find that out! Or - worse yet - it also means there wasn't even a single person who knew whom to call who knew whom to call who knew whom they could call!

Talk about degress of seperation...

Now is there really anything else you need to know about the Los Angeles Times?

I didn't think so.

UPDATE!

It is now 4:30 PM - the next day and they still have not updated the story.

UPDATE!!

It is now early Friday morning and the Friday paper is on-line and the Wednesday story still reads...

He is also survived by a son, a daughter and a granddaughter, whose names were unavailable at press time.

Maybe we can all chip in and buy an ouija board for the LA Times to help fill in the gap.

Lack Of Full Disclosure At LA Times

One of the more... interesting... policies in the very briefly posted on-line corrections of the 'Corrections Section'... is that when columns in the Opinion section are corrected, the column, i.e. the columnist, is never identified. This makes it much harder to even find the actual column since there is never a link to the column.

This makes also it difficult to see which LA Times writers are more unreliable when it comes to getting their facts straight. The same goes for the highly variable quality of the unsigned editorials that range from brilliant (when on international and to a much lesser extent, national, affairs) - to abysmal, and on occasion, so error ridden as to be useless, when discussing local and statewide issues.

Additionally, not being able to see the context in which the error was made, makes it difficult to understand the extent to which the error betrayed the public, 99% of whom will never be aware of the correction.

Today's correction in a perfect example:

Schwarzenegger appointments: An Opinion essay Sept. 4 about gubernatorial appointments and special interests stated that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's $6,000-a-month hotel suite in Sacramento was paid for by a tax-exempt group partly funded by Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric. SCE and PG&E did not contribute to that group, but the utilities did contribute to another tax-exempt group that has paid for events and billboards, featuring the governor, that promote the state.

Now this sounds like this was an article about the hotel suite and that they just got the names of two of the contributors wrong.

Right?

Dead wrong!

Here is the error in situ:

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-miles4sep04,0,7523228.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

Suite deal has nuclear glow

By Jack Miles, JACK MILES was a member of The Times' editorial board from 1991 to 1995.

GOV. ARNOLD Schwarzenegger lives in a $6,000-a-month hotel suite in Sacramento paid for by special-interest groups, notably including Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric, The Times reported on Aug. 24. What do SCE and PG&E expect from Schwarzenegger in exchange for their largesse? The Times rightly raised that question in a strongly worded editorial on Aug. 29.

Ironically, the answer appeared elsewhere in the newspaper on the very same day. Staff writers Jordan Rau and Miguel Bustillo reported Schwarzenegger's nomination — in effect, his interim appointment — of two nuclear industry lobbyists as California's representatives on the Southwestern Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission, or SWLLRWC.

That's right. The claim that SCE and PG & E gave money to personally benefit Arnold was the entire story! Clear access buying! So there was no story if that was not true! And - it wasn't!

And the claim that local utilities - who depend on business thriving in the state - gave money to promote California - outside of the state of California - is not even close. That Arnold can call attention to California through his celebrity - helps us - not him. It's not as if he needs to increase his name recognition factor in Nevada.

So why doesn't the LA Times let us know who is screwing up in their Opinion section? Why won't the LA Times ever have their 'Correction Sections' keep the corrections up for several weeks, or even days - like other newspapers? Why won't the LA Times show us how each error affected the meaning of the story in the 'Corrections Section' - and then also link to the story in question?

That way, the LAT's readers could know the truth and learn which Times' writers are most factually challenged and... uh... oh...

I just answered my own question - didn't I?

Never mind.

UPDATE!!! SMOKING GUN!!

Since Andres Martinez wants us to get to better know who is on their editorial board - I presume he also means former editorial board members who presently write opinion essays. So... I looked up Jack Miles to see what his qualifcations are for pontificating about self-interest and greed and conflicts of interest and... well, you get my drift. So I looked him up on-line and his bio proudly closes with this phrase...

... and a senior adviser to the president of the J. Paul Getty Trust in Los Angeles.

Yes, that is right! Jack Miles is the man who has been advising the president of the Getty Trust, Barry Munitz, in the looting of the Trust for his own personal gain and self-aggrandizement!

So, of course, what better person to blantly lie, I mean, hypocritically lecture us about the morality of such actions!

Only at the LA Times...

EVEN BETTER UPDATE!!

http://www.calendarlive.com/galleriesandmuseums/cl-me-getty10jun10,0,7810560.story

An article recently published in the... LA Times, of all papers... exposes, yes, dear readers - Jack Miles! - as one of the leeches feeding off the Getty Trust....

But many staffers saw Munitz squandering the trust's resources on what Margaret MacLean, an anthropologist who used to work for the Getty Conservation Institute, called "shallow vanities."

And....

Jack Miles, a former Los Angeles Times book editor and editorial board member, earned more than $100,000 as an advisor in 2003. "My job is loosely enough defined," Miles, a Pulitzer Prize-winning author of books and essays on religion and foreign affairs, said recently. "I'm not routinely involved in any component parts of the Getty."

So, of course, when the LA Times Opinion section wants to find the perfect person to challenge sweet heart deals and blatant conflicts of interest - why not go straight to the horses's mouth!

And to think... I was actually wondering why the LA Times tries to hide this stuff from us!

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

LA Observed Reports Kinsley Out At LA Times! And...Kinsley Writes Superb Column In LA Times!

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2005/09/first_thing_tuesday_913.html

First, Kevin Roderick's post about the soon be announced replacement of Kinsley as head of the Editorial and Opinion pages of the LA Times:

Expect an announcement today from Times publisher Jeff Johnson that Michael Kinsley has been formally replaced as Editorial and Opinion Editor. The editorial page, Op-Ed and Current will report to Andrés Martinez, who currently oversees just editorials. Kinsley signaled in July (via leak to the New York Times) that a change was coming.

Now these pages will be supervised by someone who actually LIVES in Los Angeles! My God - what will those geniuses at the Times think of next!

Of course, it is still someone who is a very recent resident of our fair city and someone with no personal connections to LA and someone with zero memories or first hand knowledge of LA that are more than... one year old.

So, of course, he fits right in at the not so presumptive 'LA' Times!

Still, this does not answer the question of why the quality of the editorial page has NOT improved, even after Kinsley has been - presumably - not running it. There is also the continuing (and increasingly outmoded) multi-voiced, no one to take the credit or blame - collective editorial voice - which means that there is no one to take responsiblity for disasters like the Sept. 3rd earthquake editorial...

http://lacowboy.blogspot.com/2005/09/los-angeles-times-editorial-on_08.html

... an editorial that was - essentially - fully, totally and completely repudiated (and corrected), point by point - during the following week in various LA Times news stories. Of course, though, no corrections were ever made to the editorial itself.

It also means there is no one to take credit for the often seriously superb editorials that do happen to slip in from time to time, such as the recent editorial on the election in Japan...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-japan10sep10,0,4492412.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials

... and the recent one on the upcoming German election...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-german10sep10,0,7646219.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials

Now both of these editorials are superbly written, concise, and informative. They also each clearly identify why Americans should be interested in the outcomes of these elections and they are easily understood by people with no previous knowledge of the subject matters.

The perfect model of a modern major editorial!

Alas, the LA Times' ever increasing problem is that the quality - and accuracy - of the Editorial Page is invariably in complete, direct and inverse proportion to the distance of subject matter from the City of Los Angeles.

So it generally takes about a distance of, say, at least... 3,000 miles... for the LA Times to know what the hell it is talking about.

OK - now on to Mr. Kinsley himself.

And let us speak kindly of the dead.

The good news about him was that he was not afraid to experiment and take chances. Granted, now these... experiments.... did not always work out - wicki, wacky wikitorials, anyone? - but at least he tried. He also often took postions in his signed columns that were unexpected and even made one actually... think... about how one had previously viewed a subject.

An excellent example is his recent reflections on Hurricane Katrina; below are the closing three paragraphs of the column:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-kinsley11sep11,1,7656580.column

Obviously — obviously in hindsight, that is — we should have spent the money to strengthen the New Orleans levees. President Clinton should have done it. Presidents Bush the Elder and Reagan should have done it. As Tim Noah notes in Slate, warnings about the perilous New Orleans levees go back at least to Fanny Trollope in 1832. In fact, the one president who is pretty much in the clear on this is our current Bush — not because he did anything about the levees but because even if he had started something, it probably wouldn't have been finished yet.

Everybody is having a fine fit about our politicians, governments at every level and "institutions" (current vogue word) for failing us in this crisis and others. The TV news networks, which only a few months ago were piously suppressing emotional fireworks by their pundits, are now piously encouraging their news anchors to break out of the emotional straitjackets and express outrage. A Los Angeles Times colleague of mine, appearing on CNN last week to talk about Katrina, was told by a producer to "get angry." But just Google a phrase like "commission warns," or "urgent steps" or "our children's future" — or simply "crisis" — and you may develop a bit of sympathy for the people who stand accused today of ignoring the warnings about anything in particular. Far from complacent about potential perils, we suffer from peril gridlock.

Did all the attention and money devoted to protecting us from a terror attack after 9/11 leave us less prepared for a giant flood? Undoubtedly. And if the flood had come first, the opposite would be true. We, the citizens, would have demanded it, and then blamed the politicians and the "institutions" when it turned out to be a bad bet. There is no foresight. We fight the last war because hindsight is all we really have.

Not what one would expect from the LA Times, right? Light and not heat. Reason and reflection - and not dogma and didacticism.

So while Kinsley was not the right choice to head the Editorial and Opinion Pages - a signed column of his will always be at the top of my to read list.

UPDATE!

Looks like there will no column for Kinsley at the LA Times - at least not for now. From LA Observed, the first paragraphs of Kinsley's e-mail to Times staffers:

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2005/09/kinsley_leaving_on_bitter_1.html#more

From: Michael Kinsley
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:54 AM
Subject: local news

Hi. In case you haven't heard already, the Publisher is announcing this morning that I'm leaving the Los Angeles Times. The news stories a few weeks ago saying that I would be giving up managerial duties but staying with the paper were not wrong. That is what I wanted and what John Carroll wanted too. But Jeff wants a "clean break." He did offer to discuss at some future date the possibility of my continuing to write a column as a non-employee. And he raised the possibility of some consulting on web matters down the road.

This did not seem overly welcoming, and further inquiries by me and others have made clear that it wasn't intended to. For whatever reason, Jeff isn't merely uninterested in any future contribution I might make, but actively wants me gone. So I'm off, with some regret and some excitement, to the Washington Post, duties TBD but including the column. I hope it will continue to appear in the LA Times as well, but that is beyond my control.

The rest of the letter is at the above link.

OK - This Time I Mean It - Final Post/Update On Power Blackout!

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2005/09/first_thing_tuesday_913.html

As I obsessively reported yesterday, the LA Times was about the last place (surprise! surprise!) in - or out of - town to have a staff writen story about the blackout - or to report the cause of the blackout. Below is from today's LAObserved:

The Times was slow to put a story on its website about Monday's blackout, but had its own power problems. The first wire story had to be posted from Chicago, and reporters who live outside the dark zone were sent home to cobble together the eventual staff story. Of course, the Business Journal also was blacked out and beat the LAT wire story to the web by 25 minutes.

However... Eric Richarson of http://www.blogdowntown.com/ reported to me via cell phone - since we both reside or work on Spring Street as does the LA Times - that when the rest of downtown was still dark, the LA Times appeared to him to have at least some lights on due to (presumably) generator power.

And this was well before I had my lights on which was well before 2 PM as my first post-power post was 1:55. And the LA Times' first story was at... 2:26 PM -- more than a half-hour AFTER the power was restored to Spring Street!

So... is the 'power out at the LA Times' leak to Kevin at LAObserved... just part of a fiendishly clever and highly sophisticated... disinformation campaign?

Bored minds want to know!

Lunching with LAT reporter today (super double secret undercover, of course) - so will get first hand report.

(Damn. Guess that means another power outage update!)

UPDATE!

LAT Reporter lunch -- canceled!

The Plot Thickens!!

(well... actually... the person that the LA Times he/she/trans-gendered person and I were going to lunch with did the canceling... but ... why spoil a perfectly good conspiracy story with some inconvenient facts!)

Monday, September 12, 2005

More On Power Outage!

Power now on , but still police, fire and other emergency sirens. Everyone very calm, though, and people are returning to work, though traffic is still congested. Everyone I called in the DWP area seemed to have lost power, but everyone outside of DWP service area seemed to be fine. More later.

UPDATE 1:55 pm

Drudge reports a DWP power line snapped. LA Times did have a news alert ASAP, but they are still using the AP wire report with no mention of possible power line snap.

UPDATE 2:00

ABC reports that a DWP employee accidentally cut a power line in West LA and cited two sources for the information.

UPDATE 2:10

Daily news has staff written report with some new info:

A Los Angeles Department of Water and Power spokeswoman said two ``receiving stations'' were impacted, and that crews were working to determine the cause. She could not immediately estimate when power would be restored or how many customers were affected.

Nothing staff written at LA Times yet.

UPDATE 2:20

Other info from Daily News article:

Traffic lights throughout downtown and the Valley were not working, causing major traffic tie-ups, officials said. Electricity was out briefly at City Hall and Los Angeles International Airport, and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority was running its subways using back-up generators.

Still nothing at LA Times.

UPDATE 2:28

No sirens downtown for at least ten/fifteen minutes. Everything back to normal here. Multiple sources now saying it was an accidentally cut cable in West LA quoting both state and DWP sources. Still nothing but old AP story at LA Times.

Why am I not surprised?

UPDATE!!

LA Times finally posts story. It is dated 2:26... but I could not get it to come up until, now at 2:30. Below is what LA Times added to the AP wire story:

By Sharon Bernstein
Times Staff Writer

2:26 PM PDT, September 12, 2005

A wide ranging power outage caused by an accidently cut cable darkened large sections of downtown Los Angeles and many parts of the San Fernando valley shortly after noon today, authorities said.

Lee Sapaden, a spokesman for the county Office of Emergency Management, said the massive power failure was caused after an employee "inadvertenly cut a power cable" at a DWP substation in West Los Angeles.

The outage dimmed much of downtown Los Angeles and other parts of the city, Burbank, Glendale and the southest San Fernando Valley, Sapaden said.

UPDATE 2:36

www.laobserved.com reports links to the LA Business Journal which at 2:15 had a report up that it was a mechanical failure at two receiving stations. Kevin also links to a detailed 1:43 Reuters story and reports that CBS also had the accidentally cable cut story posted at 2:19 on their on-line site, which ABC was broadcasting at least by 2 PM.

So why was the LA TIMES last to report this?

FINAL WORD

Wasn't a cut cable after all - just two wires put together that should... not... ever.... ever... be put together.

Now repeat after me. Red Wire to Red Wire. Green Wire to Green Wire. And Yellow Wire to...
(multiple deleted expletives not suitable for a family blog).... Wire ....

We shall now return to our regular programming.

FINAL FINAL WORD

OK - So now they did cut a cable, after all. And... then... they also stuck two wrong wires together.

Downtown And Most Of LA Goes Dark!

Power just came back on downtown, but below is the AP wire report:


Large Portion of Los Angeles Loses PowerSep 12 4:40 PM US/Eastern

By LAURA WIDES Associated Press Writer

LOS ANGELES

A large portion of Los Angeles was hit with a blackout Monday afternoon. The city was investigating the cause and extent of the outage. But Sgt. Catherine Plows, a police spokeswoman, said terrorism was not suspected.

Electrical power was knocked out shortly before 1 p.m. after two power surges, and traffic was snarled at intersections throughout the city when stop lights went dark. The lights also went out at downtown high- rises.

The Police Department went on "full tactical alert," meaning no officers were allowed to leave duty.

The blackout came a day after ABC aired a videotape of a purported al- Qaida member making terrorist threats against Los Angeles and Melbourne, Australia, on the fourth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Heavy usage on hot days can lead to blackouts. But the weather in Los Angeles was not unsually hot Monday.

Ernest Adams Update!

The homeless man so brutually beaten several weeks ago in Downtown Los Angeles it was not certain if he was going to live, is now out of danger. He has even recovered enough to be transferred into an after care rehabilitation center.

Ernest, though, still has a lot of rehab to do, and the medical after affects of the attack are not yet all known, but he is already well enough to walk and shower by himself.

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Attack Threatened On Los Angeles By al Queda. 9/11 Warning To City.

(see updates at bottom to see how long it will be before the LA TIMES reports on this)

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Investigation/story?id=1115448&page=1


Tape Released: American al Qaeda Member Warns of Attacks

Names Los Angeles and Melbourne as Next Targets

By BRIAN ROSS

Sep. 11, 2005 - In an apparent Sept. 11 communiqué broadcast on ABC News, an al Qaeda operative threatens new attacks against cities in the US and Australia.

"Yesterday, London and Madrid. Tomorrow, Los Angeles and Melbourne, God willing. At this time, don't count on us demonstrating restraint or compassion," the tape warns. "We are Muslims. We love peace, but peace on our terms, peace as laid down by Islam, not the so-called peace of occupiers and dictators."

American intelligence officials believe the man who appears on the tape to be Adam Gadahn of Orange County, Calif. Last year, Gadahn delivered a similar taped communiqué for al Qaeda. That tape was later deemed authentic.

On the new tape, delivered to ABC News, Gadahn's message contains a very pointed al Qaeda threat against Los Angeles and Melbourne.

In response to the threats against their city, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the city's police department released a statement this morning. They admitted to Los Angeles being a target of terrorism, but said there are no known, credible threats against the city and labeled the tape an instrument of al Qaeda propaganda.

"The statement broadcast this morning on Good Morning America should come as no surprise to anyone. The statement was meant to instill fear, and fear is the most important weapon the terrorists possess."

The taped diatribe lasts 11 minutes. Like past tapes, it appears to include the same graphics and production techniques recognized by U.S. officials as part of al Qaeda's standard propaganda production. In this tape, the speaker levels threats against the U.S. and Great Britain.

"Don't believe the lies of the liars at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and 10 Downing Street," Gadahn insists. "They have dispatched your sons and daughters to die lonely deaths in the burning deserts of Iraq and the unforgiving mountains of Afghanistan."

Only a few years ago, Adam Gadahn was a southern California teenager with interests in the environment and heavy metal music.

His family says he converted to Islam at an Orange County mosque. There, officials say Gadahn came under the influence of militants who took him to Pakistan.

He has since emerged as an al Qaeda propaganda tool. His latest message warns Americans an attack is imminent unless the United States stops its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We love peace, but when the enemy violates that peace or prevents us from achieving it, then we love nothing better than the heat of battle, the echo of explosion, and the slitting of the throats of the infidels," the tape says.

As for the rest of the tape, the young man attempts to dispel any rumors or reports of bin Laden being deceased. He closes his tape by invoking the names of the September 11th hijackers.

"Everyone of us is Mohammed Atta," he says.

ABC News' Chris Isham, David Scott, Gretchen Peters, Krista Kjellman, and Avni Patel contributed to this report.

Thursday, September 08, 2005

Los Angeles Times Editorial On Earthquakes - Gets All Its Facts Wrong!

UPDATE! - See addendum at end on how even the LA Times disagrees with the LA Times Editorial page!

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-calif03sep03,1,6127330.story?coll=la-news-comment


My, God!

Does anyone at the LA Times read the editorials before they publish then?

More importantly - does anyone even read at the LA Times?

I ask this because word for word - the most factually challenged part of the Times - despite serious competition from every other LAT section - is the Editorial Page! It still remains the most unreliable section of the LA Times!!

And it's never even close!

It's always a clean - albeit fully self-inflicted- knock-out!

But I do have a solution for all the, um, black eyes the LA Times Editorial Section has been receiving, even though it is a somewhat... ahem.... self-serving one.

To begin with, to put it bluntly, I work cheap.

I mean... really... really... cheap.

I'm talking... Jack Benny would hire me in a second... cheap.

So how about hiring me to read what you publish before you publish it? I mean, why not? I've got a strong stomach! Abs of Steel! I can handle it!

In fact - I'll even tackle the ... whole paper!

Bring it on! All of it! (of course... in some seriously fine print... I'd have to insert the mandatory... Joel Stein... exclusion. But that's cool! No one reads him anyway, so who the hell cares what he writes?)

But seriously, guys, just how bad could I be?

I mean, it's not like I could be any worse than what you've got.

Though, to be honest (and, shucks, us cowboys always have to be honest), I've gotta admit that even most twelve-year olds would be better fact checkers than whoever edits, much less writes your editorials now. But, of course, actually hiring a twelve-year old, brings up certain, shall we say, pesky... legal issues.

Paying twelve-years-olds to read the LA Times would be... child abuse.

Look it up! It's in the LA Municipal Code! Right between mullets on five-year-olds and allowing minors within 500 yards of anything written by Steve Lopez or Joel Stein. Thirty days in jail and a five hundred dollar fine.

Ok, now that we've settled that (and my number, as always, if case you have lost it... again... is, 213-555-1212), let's get to the LAT's latest editorial debacle:

The basic concept of last Saturday's editorial - what happens if LA gets hit by a quake say... in the... 9.0 range:

But what if a monster quake - something in the magnitude 9.0 range - hits greater Los Angeles?

Hey, as long as we're all living in fantasy land - why not make it an earthquake in 90.0 range? Or an earthquake in 900.0 range? Or George Bush caught en flagrante delicto with Michael Moore?

I mean, all three are about as likely as a 9.0 in LA.

I say this because in historic times, the LA Basin has never been hit by an earthquake over, say, 6.9. Not once! Never! Zero times in over 200 years! And the last time even a 7.5 range earthquake hit the LA basin (as opposed to the entire southern half of the state) was roughly... say... 7,000 - 8,000 - years ago, give or take the odd thousand years.

And there is not even a single geologic record - ever - at any time - ever (and, did I yet mention... ever?) showing that the LA basin has ever (I repeat, ever) been hit by an 8.0 quake - much less by the far, far larger 9.0 quake the Times incredibly proposes.

So, of course, when discussing how to prepare for the future, a 9.0 earthquake is the base-line the LA Times Editorial Page uses in its discussion.

OK - so much for the idea that anyone who wrote, edited or even read this editorial at the LA Times has even the remotest clue about real world seismology. Or any belief that anyone at the LA Times has any concern for the truth.

So now let's look at their knowledge of... California (you know... California?... that funny looking state two states below... Washington?) history:

Before this week's catastrophe in New Orleans, San Francisco in 1906 was the last major American city to take a near-fatal blow.

Near fatal blow?

Really?

San Francisco actually came close to... dying... back in 1906?

Well, for all you students in remedial (i.e., bonehead) American History 101, American cities sorta burned to the ground with quite regular regularity right up until the WW I era - each one of them (New York, Chicago, Boston, Baltimore, etc.) quickly came back bigger and stronger than before.

A perfect record. And all of them were stronger after the fire than before the fire. So the idea that the 1906 San Francisco fire was a near fatal event - i.e., that the city almost ceased to exist - is... clearly.... untrue.

It is also a complete and total lie, of course, like many of the 'facts' in the editorial, but... the more subtle way of just saying 'untrue' just reads... funnier.

Next we come to the alleged difference between San Francisco and New Orleans:

One major difference from the New Orleans situation was that many San Franciscans were able to get to the waterfront and take ferries to Oakland and other nearby cities that did not suffer such severe damage.

Uh, wrong. While the fire did most of the damage and burned alive people trapped in the ruins - it was a relatively slow moving fire that most people could outwalk, much less outrun. It was not a storm surge - or a rapidly filling coffin of water after the levees breached. The ferries did not save anyone's lives. Just standing on the beach would have done that.

Now people did take ferry boats to get to areas that could provide food and shelter, but they also could walk to the many other parts of the city that were not burned or go down the Peninsula. The ferry was convenient, but immaterial. And the East Bay areas were also hit hard by the earthquake, with considerable damage - though no big fire. Much like adjoining areas in Louisiana which had hurricane damage and no utilities for days if not weeks, but no major flooding.

The difference between the two situations in having safe zones to escape too is... negligible. What made New Orleans unique was the residents inability to escape the rapidly rising water. Even if they had been ferries to take them to the mostly unflooded West Bank of the city, they would have been of limited use once people were trapped in their homes.

The only real difference between this disaster and any other disaster is that the land under much of the city - as of right now - simply does not exist. It's just not there. And it won't be there for a very long time. And the cost - and the risks of reclaiming that land will be beyond any disaster this country has ever faced. Likely, if it was not a city as special as New Orleans - it simply would not be worth the risk - or the cost - compared to rehousing some of the people in a safer area.

Lastly, there is the single most preposterous statement in the whole editorial:

Like the people of New Orleans, Californians clustered around L.A. and San Francisco tempt fate on a daily basis, having decided to live in a vulnerable place that Mother Nature could instantly extinguish.

Instantly extinguish? An entire... city? Can someone please buy the LAT's editors a... dictionary? It means to wipe out.. completely.

Well, to begin with, unlike New Orleans - no matter how hard a quake is - the ground here is still left to rebuild. Just like after a fire. Unlike New Orleans - we are not below sea level and capable of being totally 100% destroyed by a direct hit of a Category 5 hurricane. Unlike New Orleans, two hurricanes in two years can not literally wipe out all the protective land between the city and the ocean, making the city actually part of the ocean. It is physically possible to... extinguish... New Orleans. There is zero comparison between the situations.

But let's talk about the real possible damage to the city by using San Francisco as an example. In 1906 San Francisco was hit by an earthquake far stronger than any quake the LA area has been hit with in the past 15,000 years, if not longer. And still, if it had not been for the fire, the city would have been fully up and running within a year. In fact, even after the fire, within a year many of the people and the businesses were already back in the city.

Furthermore, most of the newer office buildings and hotels built in the fire area survived both the quake - and the fire (though their interiors had to be rebuilt, of course) and many of them are still stand on Market Street. Additionally, huge sections of Victorian houses - all of which pre-date the fire - still line the streets of San Francisco; miles and miles of them.

And all this was with - pre-1906 building codes!

Hardly sounds like a city that was... extinguished - even after an earthquake far larger than any ever recorded in 15,000 years in Los Angeles - and after a fire started by wood burning stoves in an almost all wood frame city, built wall to wall. And pre-1906 building codes.

So the facts of the most devastating earthquake in this country's history - totally refute the LA Times' fully bogus claim.

But - just to fully play this out - what if this mythical 9.0 earthquake did hit the LA area? Would LA be... extinguished?

Well... no!

The second strongest earthquake in modern history - one of only TWO over 9.0 quakes (by present recording standards) in modern times hit near Anchorage in 1964. And there was massive damage on the unstable bluffs overlooking the harbor and in the parts of town that were built over layers of highly unstable clay. But despite internet myths - the majority of all structures in Anchorage, survived. Many of the wood frame homes, in fact, had little damage and the new steel framed buildings did very well. In fact, little more than a dozen people died from the actual quake in the 'extinguished' city.

So even after a city with some of the most unstable ground in the country was hit by a 9.2 quake - that city still largely stood and it was in far better shape than New Orleans is. And it certainly was nothing even remotely close to being extinguished... unlike New Orleans could be with a direct Category 5 hit.

So why does the LA Times lie to us? Why can we not expect even the simplest fact in their editorials to be... actual facts? I mean, even the death toll they gave for the San Francisco quake was in the long, long discredited 700 range , even though the more known more accurate figure of over 3,000 was (finally) officially endorsed earlier this year.

Lastly - even the figure given for the distance between LA (actually, Santa Monica) and New Orleans was technically wrong. When distances are given between two places, it is 'as the crow flies' unless it is quantified as the driving distance or any other type of distance. But the LAT only gave the driving distance (or at least that was the figure closest to the figure they gave), without saying it was driving distance and not the 'true' distance between the two cities. A very, very minor point, but still, it shows a pattern of disregard for accuracy or clarity.

So will the LA Times correct these errors? Will they apologize to us for these errors? Of course not! They still refuse to correct a statement that housing prices have collapsed in San Francisco!

LA needs to prepare for our eventual 'the big one' earthquake. But we are stuck with a dying newspaper with a Editorial Page that - for obvious reasons - no longer has any street cred with even the few who read it. And with so many LA Times editorials getting their facts so dead wrong that they are essentially... worthless... I do know one thing. The LA Times is our Civic Disgrace. It is our Superdome. The only difference is that, in our case, the people inside it are not the innocent victims; they are the perpetrator of the outrage.

And our only solution to get every one of editors and publishers who are at the top of the food chain at the LAT into a one-way bus... and get them the hell out of Los Angeles. So, to accomplish this patriotic act, if any of you still subscribe or advertise in the LA Times - why not take that money - and donate it to hurricane relief?

This way you can help both the Gulf Coast - and your own city at the same time. So give - and keep giving until it hurts - the LA Times - and show that you, too, care about our city.

ADDENDUM --

This post was put up long after I wrote it as my physical condition has made it hard to me to physically edit or write. In the meantime, another LAT news article has given the correct Frisco quake death numbers and on Thursday a realistic look at what would happen was written - in the news and not the Editorial Page, of course - by Jia-Rui Chong and Hector Becerra:

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-me-quake8sep08,0,7813962.story?page=2&track=hpmostemailedlink

The article - correctly - lays out a scenario that totally contradicts everything the Editorial staff of the Times said last Saturday. The only very, very minor quibble I have is the following statement:

A catastrophic temblor at the right spot along the San Andreas could significantly reduce energy and water supplies — at least temporarily, she and others said. Researchers at the Southern California Earthquake Center said there is an 80% to 90% chance that a temblor of 7.0 or greater magnitude will strike Southern California before 2024.

Now everything said there is correct. Totally correct. The one minor omission, though, is not telling us that the San Andreas Fault does not cross the LA Basin, and that the vast majority of it is not in LA County as the fault runs from Kern County to Imperial County. But the potential for temporary disruption to our energy and water infrastructure is fully correct no matter where the quake hits on the fault in Southern California.

Sunday, September 04, 2005

Hurricane Katrina Blogger Brendan Loy Makes New York Times! And Media Refuses To Accept Blame For Its Failings!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/05/technology/05blog.html

The affect bloggers can (and, conversely, can not) have on news coverage is detailed in an article in tomorrow's New York Times. The story details how Brendan Loy became one of the first people to predict what was going to happen to New Orleans. He was also the very first person to nationally sound the alarm that the mayor of New Orleans, Ray C. Nagin, was totally failing his citizens.

Now when I had first started following the story closely two Saturdays ago, I checked with the local blogger sites in New Orleans and found no concern about what their local leadership was doing after Nagin had still refused to order a mandatory evacuation of the city.

Then on Sunday morning, when I checked in again with local NO bloggers and local NO news sites, I again saw no mention of Nagin's behavior. The I watched Nagin's TV interview and I saw how the local news media was too cowardly to confront him about his doing nothing - and I mean absolutely, nothing - to get the poor and the sick and the physically incapacitated OUT of the city when the city was projected to be either totally destroyed or completely flooded with water.

I also watched as local reporters were too afraid to contradict him when he claimed - and this was at the time the then Category 5 was projected to directly hit the city - that in just two weeks - all the water would be pumped out and all the utilities would be back!

Again, not one person anywhere in the MSM said... anything... about this lie, then or since.

I then watched as the news media again said... nothing... as Nagin claimed on TV that the flood waters after the hurricane would NOT be toxic. At that point, I belatedly started blogging non-stop (unaware of Brendan and the handful of others pre-existing efforts), asking - doesn't anyone out there realize that the mayor of New Orleans.... is crazy?

Below is the first part of the New York Times article:

ANDREW ADAM NEWMAN

One of the earliest and perhaps clearest alarms about Hurricane Katrina's potential threat to New Orleans was sounded not by the Weather Channel or a government agency but by a self-described weather nerd sitting on a couch in Indiana with a laptop computer and a remote control.

"At the risk of being alarmist, we could be 3-4 days away from an unprecedented cataclysm that could kill as many as 100,000 people in New Orleans," Brendan Loy, who is 23 and has no formal meteorological training, wrote on Aug. 26 in his blog, irishtrojan.com. "If I were in New Orleans, I would seriously consider getting the hell out of Dodge right now, just in case."

Mr. Loy's posting that Friday afternoon came three days before the hurricane struck and two days before the mayor of New Orleans, Ray C. Nagin, issued an evacuation order. Posts over the next several days, in aggregate, seem now like an eerie rewriting of the tale of Chicken Little, in which the sky does in fact fall.

In the cooperative and competitive world of blogs, Mr. Loy's has gotten some serious praise. Mickey Kaus, whose kausfiles blog is featured on Slate.com, wrote on Friday that "Loy's blog for the past week is a pretty extraordinary document," adding that "it should maybe be in the Smithsonian, if you can put a blog in the Smithsonian."

Glenn Reynolds, who blogs at instapundit.com, linked to Mr. Loy's Web site several times beginning on Aug. 26. That's the Internet equivalent of a northeaster, and all over, blogs started linking to Mr. Loy's. (Jeff Masters and Charles Fenwick, among others, also gave early and dire warnings about New Orleans on their highly trafficked weather blogs.)

According to Blog Pulse from Intelliseek, which measures blog links, Mr. Loy's was the most frequently cited nonnews source among hurricane-related blogs. On Aug. 28, it was ranked 14th among most frequently linked-to sites of all sorts.

That was more weight than Mr. Loy, who weighs 160 and is 6 foot 2, is accustomed to throwing around. A second-year law student at Notre Dame, he began blogging in 2002 - writing about football (his blog's name combines Notre Dame's football team, the Fighting Irish, with that of his college team, the Trojans of the University of Southern California), his cats, his dog, his fiancée Becky, the Red Sox, politics, "The Lord of the Rings" and weather.

"Hurricane Hugo was the first storm that I paid attention to, when I was 7 or 8," he said in a telephone interview from South Bend, Ind. "I found them fascinating and became kind of a weather nerd, watching the Weather Channel religiously." Mr. Loy joined online discussions with other hurricane watchers, and monitored the National Hurricane Center's Web site, whose satellite pictures he regularly posts and analyzes on his blog.

He called for Mayor Nagin to issue an evacuation order days before the mayor issued one, and his posts on the subject grew increasingly agitated. "It's definitely true that I am more willing to pull the trigger," he acknowledged, "because I don't have to deal with the consequences if they had had an evacuation and the storm hadn't hit. It's easy for me to sit here and say, 'Everyone leave.' "

He derives little pleasure from being proved right. "The results are so dire, and I knew they would be so dire, that I was fervently praying that I'd be wrong. There's always some vindication that comes from being right, but I would much rather have been wrong and be getting 1,000 hits a day now instead of 25,000."

There are three ironies here. First, the fact that the New York Times does an article on a blogger covering Nagin's complete failure to prepare his city for the disaster - and yet the New York Times itself still - over a week later - still fails to address that story as a major story or even do a story mentioning those charges.

Second, that it took a blogger in Indiana to cover this story.

Third, and most distressing, is the hypocisy of the media in New Orleans and elsewhere. Increasingly, the media is calling for the heads of literally everyone in sight due to the abject mishandling of every aspect of this disaster. And yet, these are also the very same people who - when the Mayor of New Orleans lied to the people of New Orleans about the impact of the storm on the city - said... nothing.

Absolutely... nothing.

And if anyone has the slighest question about the accuracy of this claim - listen to the tapes of the TV interview with Mayor Nagin on Sunday morning. The reporters were clearly... stunned... by the Mayor's obviously false statements, but they remained... silent.

These are also the same people who - even after it was clear that the Mayor of New Orleans was not going to do anything to get the most vulnerable out of a city that was projected to be destroyed - were all - to a man and a woman - too cowardly to say that the emperor had no clothes, much less, willing to do anything constructive about it.

These are also the same people who - as the flood waters poured into the city after the levee breaches and it was clear that the new predicted water depths would soon flood hospitals and nursing homes - remained silent as the Mayor did... nothing.

And then when the Mayor continued to still do... nothing... to get anyone out of the city or out of the places most in danger, even with a twelve hour head start... even then, the local, state and national media remained... silent.

And even as hundreds of buses and trucks that could have taken people to higher ground - or out of town - were slowly flooded in the sight of their cameras.. yet again, other than a few bloggers, the media said... nothing.

There is more than enough blame to go around for what happened in New Orleans in the past week. Far more than enough. But standing at the head of the line... is the media of New Orleans, and the media in the rest of the country; the same media that is now so self-righteously calling for everyone else's head.

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Saving Gas? Still In Town? Great Art Opening TONIGHT Saturday Sept. 3rd!

I just saw the show being hung this afternoon at the Kristi Engle Gallery and it is great! Cartoon Logic's 'Deleted Scenes' is a wonderfully sophisticated take on unsophisticated art forms and should not be missed! The opening reception is tonight, Saturday Sept. 3rd, from 6 - 9 PM at 453 S. Spring Street Suite 743. And it is only one block (well, 2 half-blocks) from the 5th and Hill (Pershing Square) Red Line subway stop.

Brady Westwater

Refugee Center Closed With Two Hours Notice - In Los Angeles!

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-african3sep03,1,2136703,print.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california

Four surprising revelations in the below story.

First, that LA County would close such a vital community resource with just two hours notice - without finding a place where all these resources could have been kept together in the area. It would seem to me that there should be enough vacant office space in the Vermont Corridor (particularly further to the south as they are/were in Koreatown at 532 S. Vermont) to temporarily house the programs until a new permanent facility is built or the old one fixed. And with the new Rapid bus on Vermont, it is now quite easy to transverse the length of the street.

Failing that, Downtown certainly has enough vacant space that could be temporarily used.

Second, why should a building built in the 1950's become so unsafe that everyone would have to leave in two hours.

Third that there were 150,000 African refugees (and a total of 350,000 African immigrants in total) in Los Angeles County. Now I am familiar with Little Ethiopia on South Fairfax and I know many Africans who have come here as students and stayed - but I have read nothing about so many refugees being settled in Los Angeles. Only in a city this size could so many people invisibly integrate into the community with little or no public notice.

Four, why has the LA Times not talked about these refuges more before this and why has it taken almost a month for this closure to a make it to the pages of Los Angeles Times?

Ann M. Simmons
Times Staff Writer

September 3, 2005

Leaders of Los Angeles' burgeoning African immigrant community are up in arms over the recent closure of a local community center that for years had provided social services to thousands of African refugees and other newcomers.

The African Community Resource Center, a nonprofit organization on Vermont Avenue, was shut down Aug. 10 after county officials deemed the building unsafe because of structural damage.

"This is disastrous for us," said Nikki Tesfai, director of the center she founded in 1984 to help serve many of the estimated 150,000 or more African refugees living in Los Angeles County. "We are not talking about just a work office. We are talking about services. Everything is stranded right now."

Tesfai said she was attending a meeting when staff members called her to say they had been ordered to evacuate the building in two hours. "My staff was so panicked," Tesfai said. "They didn't know what to take."

I just hope the Times follows up to find out exactly how this building became so unsafe, and is it County owned or just leased from a landlord? If it is privately owned, they have a responsibility to fix the problems and honor the lease. If it is County or non-profit owned, has any effort made to get local contractors to donate what is needed to fix the place to get it re-opened? Or would another location be more central to the community it serves??

More information! Do not allow this to be a one time story.

Great Story On The True Spirit Of The People Of New Orleans!

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-troops3sep03,1,1313380.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage

Scott Gold of the Los Angeles Times continues his superb coverage of how the vast majority of even the most distressed people in New Orleans are behaving:

September 3, 2005

NEW ORLEANS — Forty-four troops pressed together in their truck, swaying as one at every bump and turn like reeds in a river.

As they plunged into the dark water engulfing the business district of New Orleans, their wake pushed the body of a woman onto the steps of the Superdome. The floodwater had ripped her pants down to her knees. She was facedown in the muck, a red ribbon still tied neatly around her graying hair.

The troops, members of an elite Special Response Team from the Louisiana Army National Guard, were the first convoy out of what was rapidly becoming a massive military staging ground.

Their mission, simply, is to turn New Orleans into a police state — to "regain the city," 1st Sgt. John Jewell said.

The truck lurched through the streets, past buildings burning unabated and MPs in gun turrets. When they stopped to gear up for their arrival at the New Orleans Convention Center, where more than 15,000 people had been living in squalor since Katrina, these words echoed — for the first time, one would imagine — through the intersection of Poydras Avenue and Carondelet Street: "Lock and load!"

"Sixteen in the clip!" one Guardsman shouted, a common refrain used to indicate that rifles are fully loaded.

But when they arrived, they did not find marauding mobs. They did not come under fire. They found people who had lost everything in the storm and, since then, their dignity.

And...

The troops arrived Friday, ready for anything.

"You've got to do something," said the nurse in the New Orleans T-shirt.

"We'll get you some help as soon as some people get here," Lt. James Magee said as the troops arrived. "OK?"

And...

Frankie Estes, 80, said she was glad to finally see the troops. It was a glimmer of hope. Friday night marked her fifth night sleeping on the sidewalk in front of the center.

"I haven't had food or water for three days," she said. "I didn't know if I was going to make it."

By Friday night, dinner had been served to a seemingly endless line of refugees. Helicopters had begun descending on the convention center, airlifting the most critically ill. The troops had found their mission. It just wasn't what they thought it was going to be.

Friday, September 02, 2005

Other LA Cowboys In LA - NYT On Horses In LA!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/04/fashion/sundaystyles/04horse.html?8hpib

In an article by
In few places in the country are horses more surprising, yet more sought after, than in Los Angeles. The horse is an almost mythic element in an area that grew out of ranches and citrus groves and burnished its image in part as a setting for Hollywood westerns. Horsemanship traces back to Mexican vaquero culture, and to own horses feeds into the dream of the West's unrestricted freedom the way a boat and private dock feed into the image of aquatic glamour in Miami - and can be as much a status symbol.

Los Angeles County may now contain 10 million or so people locked in daily urban rituals, but modern-day cowboys are found in unexpected places, in horse communities in the manicured byways of Brentwood as well as in the urban grit of Compton.

Alas, it has been years since this cowboy was owned by a horse. The last time I saw the inestimable Mr. D was the day after we buried my best friend, the person who had given me Mr. D as my introduction to their world ten years before he was killed.

I groomed D for a last time after our final ride together. I then got in my pick-up and drove off. I was not aware that I was shutting the door on that period of my life and that I never was to set foot on the ranch again. But from the sounds that came from Mr. D - he must have known that we were never to see each other again.

Thoughtful Reflection On The Superdome By LAT's Christopher Hawthorne.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/cl-et-arch2sep02,1,164772.story?track=widget

Here are Christopher Hawthorne's closing words:

As Douglas Pegues Harvey put it in Texas Architect magazine, the Astrodome aimed to do nothing less than free the sporting event "from its dependency on Nature's caprice and God's sky." Its designers even thought they could use real grass inside, despite the closed roof. But glare through the window panes at the top of the dome was so distracting to fielders that the ceiling was soon painted over. The grass died, leading directly to the first appearance of AstroTurf, another icon of controlled nature.

The Superdome never had any of that space-age glamour; its architecture was always more about using brute structural force to create a huge, column-free interior space, known at the time of its opening as the biggest room in America. It is not a pretty building, but it has always been able to rely on its sheer capacity to attract events like the Super Bowl and the GOP convention.

Still, it has been experiencing a long, slow decline. In recent years, the Superdome's primary tenants, the NFL's Saints, have been seeking a new home, and the stadium has been an easy symbol of the team's misfortunes on the field. The Astrodome, meanwhile, which the Astros fled at the end of the 1999 season and now sits empty most of the time, suffered an even steeper fall from grace.

It is not just the architecture of the two domes, however, that is looking outdated this week. It is the very idea they embody so fully: that modern buildings — and, by extension, modern cities — can offer perfect protection against the elements, that Mother Nature is neither a vital source nor a threat but simply a nuisance. That notion is one victim of Katrina that none of us needs mourn.

What Is Happening In New Orleans After Hurricane Katrina Is Not A Surprise.

http://www.freep.com/cgi-bin/forms/printerfriendly.pl

http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2005-08-23/commentary.php

Two articles published just the week before Katrina hit demonstrates that what is happening in New Orleans is not just a result of the hurricane. Besides the lack of any kind of evacuation plan for the poorest residents by city officials and the lack of long term effective flood planning by everyone else, the city's crime situation was already out of contol. First an AP story dated August 22nd, 2006 by Alan Sayre:

NEW ORLEANS -- Last year, university researchers conducted an experiment in which police fired 700 blank rounds in a New Orleans neighborhood in a single afternoon. No one called to report the gunfire.

New Orleans residents are reluctant to come forward as witnesses, fearing retaliation. And experts say that's one of several reasons homicides are on the rise in the Big Easy as other cities are seeing their murder rates plummet to levels not seen in decades.

The city's murder rate is still far lower than a decade ago. But in recent years, the homicide rate has climbed again to nearly 10 times the national average.

"We're going in the reverse of 46 of the top 50 cities in the United States. Almost everyone is going down, but we're going up," said criminologist Peter Scharf. "There is something going on in New Orleans that is not going on elsewhere."

And the New Orleans Weekly Gambit (again late August of this year) finds that poverty is not the determining cause of this problem:

The Scream

At the current pace, New Orleans will exceed 300 murders by the end of the year.

New Orleans, the city we were born to love, lay in a pool of blood -- again -- last week. Raped by hate. Beaten, stabbed, strangled and bludgeoned to death by violence. She screamed for help, over and over, just as she has always done, year after year. We all saw it happen, if not on the evening news then in the daily paper. Yet, we -- her own children -- failed to save her.

It is a nightmare from which we cannot awake. Cold statistics underscore the stark reality: The number of homicides in our city last week topped 200 for the fifth year in a row. At the current pace, we will exceed 300 murders by the end of this year, according to Peter Scharf, a criminologist at the University of New Orleans. If we had New York City's crime rate, New Orleans would finish the year with only 36 murders, Scharf says. If New Orleans had the same homicide rate as Cleveland, whose poverty rate is far higher than ours, our city would finish this year with 62 murders, he adds. Other cities are experiencing double-digit declines in their homicide rates -- as high as 30 percent. By contrast, our murder rate has been rising steadily since hitting a recent low of 162 in 1999.

And....

Why are we slipping? Mayor Ray Nagin and Police Chief Eddie Compass have offered various explanations as their own best crime-fighting efforts (improved police pay, security cameras in high-crime areas, and domestic violence training for cops) fail to stem the tide of bloodshed. For example, the mayor and the chief have tried to assure us that many of our murder victims are drug addicts and criminals. That may be a factual explanation, but it is not an excuse.

Now, of course, the vast majority of the people in New Orleans are law abiding people whose daily lives are threatened by a small minority of thugs; they are the victims of these thugs. I have visited the city many times and recall the friendliness and the hospitality of everyone I met.

What you are seeing on TV is NOT the citizens of New Orleans suddenly turning into violent crminals. The shootings and rapes and fire setting are the work of violent criminals taking advantage of the situation. To think that they in any way represent the vast majority of the people of New Orleans is a slander. But this breakdown does show that continuing failure to take control of the streets from this handful of thugs prior to Katrina, has considerably worsened the present situation.

And, again, there is also a lesson for Los Angeles here. Despite our still dropping crimes rates, we still have a problem with too many neighborhoods being terorized by gangs. And it is going to take more than just the police to deal with both the the criminal activities of the gangs and the culture that too often celebrates and encourages them.

Thursday, September 01, 2005

More Bad News At The Getty! Is Munitz's End Finally Near?

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-getty2sep02,0,5658130,print.story?coll=la-tot-promo

While the Getty Board has so far ignored Munitz's personal and professional misdeeds, Barry Munitz may have - finally - hung himself.

It is one thing to deprive Los Angeles of a first rate art museum by using the Trust's funds to make friends throughout the world, it is one thing to lavish personal perks on himself and his buddies, and it is one thing to terrorize his staff to the point that many of them fled the Getty. But, according to the Los Angeles Times, it is quite another to hide incriminating evidence in a major criminal case from both the authorities - and the board.

And that is what Barry Munitz appears to have done:

By Jason Felch and Ralph Frammolino
Times Staff Writers

4:58 PM PDT, September 1, 2005

The J. Paul Getty Trust, which has said it was fully cooperating with Italian authorities, did not disclose a series of letters and photographs that show its chief antiquities curator maintained close relationships with dealers suspected of selling art looted from Italy, according to documents and interviews.

The Getty's antiquities curator, Marion True, is facing trial in Rome this fall on charges that she conspired to traffic in ancient artifacts stolen from Italian ruins and smuggled out of the country. Italian authorities have identified 42 objects - including some of the most prized antiquities in the Getty's collection - as stolen and have demanded their return. They are also investigating other American museums.

The Getty and True declined comment. They have in the past maintained her innocence.

According to a confidential memo written in 2001 by the Getty's criminal defense lawyer to Getty chief executive Barry Munitz, an internal review of Getty files had turned up a handful of letters from the suspect dealers as well as Polaroid photographs of artifacts.

And Getty Trust Board Chair and chief Bary Munitz apologist, John Biggs, appears to have - at least in part - been his co-conspirator:

Getty board chairman John Biggs, former chairman and chief executive of TIAA-CREF, the investment fund for education professionals, said he has seen relevant documents from the internal review."I've seen them myself and I think there's no merit to what you're trying to write a story about. It's all part of a systematic effort that the L.A. Times has undertaken to write stories about the Getty," Biggs said.

Two other Getty board members, Barbara Fleischman and Ramon Cortines, said they were unaware of the documents, and believed board members should have been briefed about what the internal review found.Fleischman said she was "flabbergasted" to learn the Getty has documents it has not provided to the Italians.

"I'm shocked," she said. "My knowledge is that full cooperation has been given to the Italians."

Cortines said, "If there were pictures and if there were damaging documents, as a board member I believe I should have seen that and been informed. There should have been a discussion about how we as a board were going to respond.

"Stonewalling is not handling an issue," added Cortines, a former superintendent of Los Angeles schools.

It is hard to imagine that this misdeed will not - finally - get the board take responsibilty for the current problems and resolve the cause of the problems by removing both Barry Munitz and John Biggs. If not, then the remainder of the board is guilty of approving of their actions.

Laura and Celia

http://5thandspring.blogspot.com/2005/09/laura-comes-home.html

Laura, the sister of my on-line friend across the street, Celia, is nearing the end of her year long battle against cancer. I wish there was some thing I could say that could in any way help at times like this, but I know there isn't. Only time can begin to bring solace to those left behind. And only time can allow for the memories that one recalls, slowly become memories of only the good times.

Charlie LeDuff Found - But Now He May Have Wanted to Stay Lost!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/arts/television/02tvwk.html

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/003974.html

Recently Kevin over at LAObserved discovered why LA based New York Times writer Charlie LeDuff's by-line had vanished for some time. I had noticed that myself, but - as usual - never got around to asking what had happened to him. This even though, after he had considerable problems learning the territory, Charlie actually - finally - became a first rate commentator of all things Los Angeles and I began to look forward to reading him.

Surprisingly, Kevin reported that Charlie is now the star of his very own reality show. I mean, can it be any more clear that reality shows 'have jumped the shark' when they are now using... journalists.

But since the show is a first hand - in every way - look at the various off-beat sub-cultures in the US - it seemed a perfect fit for good old Charlie. Alas, the first review that I came across was pretty brutal - and - it was from the New York Times! I can only imagine what the review might have been like if poor Charlie wrote for the... New York Post.

Every once in a while, maybe three times an episode (to judge from the first two), "Only in America" produces a moment that stays with you.

Dan, a member of an Oakland biker club called the East Bay Rats, describes the long-ago humiliation of being gang-stomped while his friends looked on and did nothing. It can't happen to him again, he says, now that he's a Rat. (Of course, you have to endure a group beating from fellow Rats when you join the club, and members regularly pound each other in a makeshift ring while friends cheer them on during informal fight nights, but people are complicated.)

Dan chokes up and walks away from Charlie LeDuff, the show's host, who stands there with his chin in his palm. The camera lingers, allowing another Rat to wander into the frame and exchange a sympathetic look with Mr. LeDuff behind Dan's back. Everything the episode wants to address, especially the urge to ratify community with intramural violence, hangs unspoken in the air between them.

And...

America's enduring weirdness beckons to an enterprising reporter seeking resonant subcultures. In addition to bikers and gay rodeo riders, Mr. LeDuff will visit arena football players, fashion models, battle re-enactors and others. Find a scene, work your way into it, hang out, point the camera at people with something to say and let them say it. You can't go wrong.

Actually, you can. Mr. LeDuff too often gets between us and the people he wants to introduce to us. He has a sense of humor, and one can appreciate the gameness of a reporter who will dress up in drag to fall off a steer, but there's just too much of him, and he can't seem to get over himself. His overstyled voiceovers do little to frame the action in an explanatory bigger picture, and he takes up too much screen time. He talks too much, and too often he's talking about himself. "These guys respect me, like, I'm a gamer," he says of the East Bay Rats. Even if true, the line makes you wince.

One also grows tired of Mr. LeDuff's self-regarding need to mark his territory. Depending on whom he's hanging out with, he will start droppin' his g's and otherwise broadening his variable regular-guy diction. When he offers an analytical insight - for instance, when women fight, "it's kinda hot" - he'll put some extra stoner drag in his voice to assure us he's no egghead. Hanging with the head Rat at ringside, Mr. LeDuff is moved to remark, "You're like the Svengali of a lost generation, man."

And... lastly...

Each episode has a sustained gimmick. Charlie's going to fight a giant Rat named Big Mike. Charlie's not going to let any gay wannabe cowboy outride him. Will he walk out or be carried out? It's forced and lame, and it suggests that "Only in America" doesn't trust regular weird American folks to hold our interest.

Ouch! And then reviewer (Carlo Rotella) even declined to state the day, time - or even what cable network the show is going to be on. Hmmm... sounds almost personal.

I guess the days of participatory/gonzo journalism so personified Tom Wolfe, George Plimpton and Hunter Thompson went up in flames with Hunter's corpse.

Too bad I can't afford cable to see if I agree in any with the review or not. Anyone over at Discovery want to send me a review copy? And Charlie - if you ever need a dopamine rush after reading that review -- feel free to call me. I'll even pretend to let you win. There's only so much reality a man can take.