Saturday, June 18, 2005

Happy Father's Day, LA Cowboy, Senior!!



         













Myself, my grand-nephew who is my father's great-grandson, my sister and my now still active and vigorous 89 year old father when he was in his mid-80's.

As I entered adolescence in the 1960's, a common criticism of 1950's sit-coms such as 'Leave It To Beaver', 'Ozzie and Harriet' and 'Father Knows Best' was that the they screwed up the kids of my era by presenting an unrealistic view of family life. I really didn't understand this, however, as the families in those shows did not seem all that different from my own family. It was only much later when I realized how exceptionally unexceptional my own upbringing, and my own parents, had been.

From the earliest I can remember, we were always treated more as young adults than as kids. Our parents talked to us about everything (and never talked down to us) and, even more importantly, they always listened to us.

I remember when I once complained to my father as he was dropping me off at Miss Francis' Nursery School on Occidental Boulevard (just north of Third as I recall, near the Precious Blood School) that I didn't want to go there; they simply didn't have any good books to read (as few of the other kids could yet read) and we spent way too much time napping and that it was just generally... boring. So after a short discussion, he took me home and I no longer had to go there and other arrangements were made until I could start kindergarten early.

Conversely, however, when my teachers wanted me to skip grades, my parents always consulted with me, and we agreed that it was better for me to remain with my own friends and my own age group. They also agreed with me that I should stay in a public school as opposed to going to a private school. Even then it was clear that I was going to self-educate myself and so they - and I - preferred that I experience the social interaction of public rather than private school.

Then, a bit later, when I was recruited by a East Coast prep school, while I knew my parents would never want me to leave home, they also made it clear that the decision was totally mine. So even though the catalogue of classes and the immense range of activities at Phillips-Exter was quite tempting, I knew even then that I would never want to grow up without my family, nor that I would ever want to leave the City of LA, even for my schooling. Still later, when all my friends were going Ivy - or to Cal Berkeley or even just around the corner to Claremont, I only applied to UCLA.

Now to get back to the sit-com analogy - once I and my siblings were born, my parents no longer had (or wanted) any independent life other than as... parents. When they went out, we all went out. When they went on a trip or to a movie or to a store - or anywhere - we all went out. Now while there must have been many other occasions, I can only recall both my parents going out once and leaving us with baby sitters - my grandparents - when they went to see the Music Man at the now demolished Biltmore Theater.

My mother worked at E. F. Hutton on Spring Street before I was born (when she quit her job) and my father worked at a law office in the Doulgas Building at 3rd and Spring while he got his degree from Southwestern Law School. This was after the War had interrupted his education from 1941 - 1945 as Pearl Harbor happened while he was enrolled at UCLA. He later set up his own office there and stayed there until the upper floors were vacated for seismic concerns.

My father never smoke or drank and I do not recalling him ever even once using a four letter word in my presence during the entire time I was growing up. I also never heard any kind of racial joke or insult at the expense of anyone's race, religion or background in our home, which was a literal United Nations of kids coming and going while I was growing up. I might add that my parents were Goldwater/Reagan Republicans.

My father also coached the Hollywood YMCA's basketball team and was the sponsor of the Y Groups I was apart of such as the Indian Guides. He also became the surrogate father for the many kids I knew who no longer had their own fathers in their lives, taking us on trips, to Dodger's games and to our cabin in the mountains.

His own father, correspondingly, also had a long history of public service between working with Gifford Pinchot (founder of the National Forest system) on conservation matters and helping run war relief in the Balkans after WW I, before his early death when my father was but one year old during a 1920's flu epidemic.

My father also quietly participated in many other community projects including serving as the honorary Mayor of Westlake Park, which was, ironically, kind of the neighborhood council of its day. But what made even more of an impact on me was how he treated people in every day life. When Christmas and Thanksgiving came, he did not just write a check to a charity, but we - as a family - took food and gifts to families ourselves and we then shared their food with them and accepted gifts from them so it became an exchange of gifts from one family to another and not charity. And as a lawyer, whenever potential clients did not have enough money to hire him, he was always willing to accept barter in food, a painting, used cars (we never once had a new car) - or any other medium of exchange.

I also remember when we went to McLaren Hall (where kids whose parents were unable to take care of them were often housed temporarily) to visit the son of a single parent client who was in jail and he discovered that the kids who wanted to play baseball did not have enough balls and bats. So my father not only went out and bought them balls and bats but he also went back on weekends and hit balls with them to show them that someone cared about them.

It is all those the simple, day to day acts that I most remember and cherish about my father. And it is only now that I have slowly realized that all of what I do now in my life is only my following behind him in his footsteps and my trying to apply all the lessons I learned from him as a boy so many years ago.

So even though the trail this poor cowboy has ridden - due to life's all too common tragedies - has not always been an easy one, or a typical one due to things often beyond my control, my deceased mother and my still alive father still never gave me anything less than their full love, their constant support and their ceaseless understanding, no matter how off-trail my life at many times seemed.

So Happy Father's Day - Ernest V. Shockley in the 82nd year of your life!

PS -- As you the more discerning reader may notice, my father and I do not share the same surname. These is because in my 17th summer when I discovered that I was born to ride the cowboy trail (however brief that period of my life was allowed to be) and that I was also to become a writer, I then took Brady Westwater as my pen name.

However, as those aspects of my life soon became my primary lives, by the time I was 18, it was the only name I was publicly using to the point that by the time I had left UCLA, even my family had changed over to it. So this is just another of the many examples in their never ending patience with the life I have chosen for myself.

Friday, June 17, 2005

Self-Help Graphics Shut Down!

http://art-for-a-change.com/blog/

http://www.laist.com/archives/2005/06/17/self-help_graphics_goes_down.php

On June 7th, legendary Eastside cultural institution Self-Help Graphics appears to have been shut down by its board of directors. Details are sketchy as to how permanent - or temporary the closure is, but there will be a public meeting with the board of directors 7 PM June 28th at the Avenue Studio 50 in Highland Park. See above links for more details.

Wicky Wacky Wikatorials! Great Concept - But Disastrous Start! LA Times Blows First Effort!

Too depressed to post on this now (and, too busy, too - gotta get those crime cameras up!) but will
pontificate... later.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Summer In The City! Hot And Gritty! And Mothers - Don't Let Your Daughters Grow Up To Be Bruins!

http://www.latimes.com/features/lifestyle/la-hm-rooftop16jun16,0,5185724.story?coll=la-home-style


Some weeks (months?) ago, LA Times writer, Steve Barrie-Anthony, posted on a local downtown list-serv that he wanted to interview people who held parties and socialized on their rooftops.

I quickly reviewed my dozen best rooftop experiences downtown. I then did some rough calculations, and even more quickly realized that the statue of limitations had not quite run out - and declined to participate. This (undoubtedly) was why this was such a 'G' rated story.

The article also failed to investigate the forbidden pleasures - and parties and art events - and the romantic (hell, we're talking... wild monkey sex) liaisons - that took place on forbidden rooftops during the 1960's, '70's and 80's long before the current crop of loft dwellers arrived. I remember one night in particular after we stealthily broke onto the roof of the...

But I digress.

Getting back to the article in question, it gets both the mis-en-scene and the gestalt of the current loft/roof top scene dead right. I have nothing to add to that aspect of the story, so if you are interested in the present scene - read the article.

Related to this, though, at the Central City Association (CCA) annual Housing Luncheon, Tom Gilmore did yeoman duty as panel leader/MC - and stand-up comedian. (And I did my part by delivering up to Tom the soft ball straight line of the day, for the biggest laugh of the day.) But what was increasingly interesting, was that as each developer showed the slides of his projects, a clear case of... pool envy developed.

Yes, the 'p' word was repeatedly used - and it became very clear that size does indeed matter.

As each of the latest projects boasted of their new roof-top pools, the few, older projects presented - without the increasing mandatory roof-top pool, now felt compelled to... apologize... for the lack of that amenity. Tom Gilmore did counter, though, that when he hosed off his sidewalks daily, if the storm drains backed up just right, there was the occasional... puddle.

In closing, I wish to present a clear case that the apocalypse is indeed, upon us.

To wit, an illustration that holding a high position at a major university today requires the complete absence of common sense and a total inability to relate to the real world. Please read the below mind-boggling quote:

"These rooftops are "private heavens," says Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, chairwoman of the urban planning department at UCLA. "What concerns me is the increasing tendency to take activities which were for hundreds of years part of the public realm, and privatize them. Then we'll have parks only being used by low-income and minority people, and affluent people will use private parks.

"This is not only a moral issue; it is also a practical one. The cost is the vibrancy of the city. The more we segregate cities, the more fear there is that we'll never become a community of citizens, that everybody will follow their own individualistic interests."

I mean - can you believe that... dribble?

According to her... the very fabric of society is threatened because these horribly immoral people (remember - this is a moral issue, according to her) downtown - gasp! - use their own roofs as outdoor space! My God - let's take these... criminals... and shoot them! How dare they have individual interests! Off to the Re-Education Camps! Mao shirts for everyone!

The real irony is that the people she is attacking are those who are moving into the heart of the city and revitalizing the urban fabric. But, no, that's not enough. She won't be satisfied until we're all stripped of our personal identities, working in collective farms and singing songs about Father Stalin and happy farm implements.

LA Times Goes To Work!

Literally!!

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-commute16jun16,0,1815576.story

The new 'Thinking Out Loud' section of OPINION - where the LA Times will run a series of articles examining a subject rather than writing another dumb ass editorial about it - debuted today. The inaugural subject was - surprise! - traffic!

They kicked off the series with the ten members of editorial page staff each reporting on the length, obstacles and pleasures - however ... fleeting - of one day’s commute to work.

The biggest surprise is that 30% of them take public transportation. Of those three, two of them drive to get their respective bus/train station while one of them walks the three blocks. This is considerably higher than the average of high paid white collar workers.

The other not so surprising observation is that as individuals writing in their own voices - they are a lot better writers than the deadly collective voice (however singular the actual writer may be) that writes the editorials.

Cool LA Times Earthquake Coverage!

The recently promised more interactive LA Times seems to be stepping up today. First, stories about how the LAT's editorial board commutes to work (more on that later), then prompt coverage of the quake (I guess they actually have reporters in the building on Thursdays as opposed to Sundays) - and, finally, the new breaking news blog kicked in to allow readers to report their reactions/responses to the quake.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/weblog/breakingnews/

As for my downtown report - nothing.

I must have been galloping along the the sidewalk or was in the subway when it hit as I felt zip - nothing, nada, nor did anyone else around me say anything. But when I did get down the stairs to the subway at 7th and Flower after the CCA lunch at the Wilshire Grand, the North Hollywood train was being held and no Union Station train came for sometime - so maybe they stopped service until they checked that everything was OK.

It was actually not until I got back to my office after two more meetings that I even found out about it due to e-mails I had gotten.

Fascincating Article On The Inner Workings Of A Newspaper!

http://www.milwaukeemagazine.com/062005/beast.html

If you want to see how sausages, I mean, newspapers are really made - read the above link, courtsey of Romenesko. Comments later.

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Today's Best Press Line About the Press!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/15/national/15jackson.html

In today's New York Times article describing, among other things, the press seige of the Jackson ranch in Santa Maria.

"Now and then, the front gates parted part and a vehicle would appear - an S.U.V. carrying a middle-aged woman hiding her face behind her hands, a propane truck - and, each time, security guards would order camera crews to move off Mr. Jackson's land to the far side of the road.

But as soon as Mr. Jackson's father, Joe, appeared, the crews poured back across the street and attached themselves to his vehicle like metal shavings on a magnet"

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

DWP Hearing Before City Council Committee.

http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2921027,00.html

Janice Hahn chaired today (June 14th) a hearing at the City Council's Commerce, Energy and Natural Resources committee to determine if theLos Angeles Department of Water and Power had properly notified the Neighborhood Coucnils of a proposed rate increase. This hearing was necessary after mistaken press reports last week that this had not properly occurred.

Many of us who wrote and negotiated the just signed MOU between the DWP and the NC's were there and we verified that the DWP had fulfilled the letter, the intent and the spirit of our agreement.

And now that the DWP has approved it's budget, an indpendent review will take place to see if the budget and the possible rate hike are warranted. The the NC's will be given a minimum of 90 days to exmanine the rate hike after it has been officially taken to the City Council.

Monday, June 13, 2005

Superb LA Times Article On SCI-Arc - Other Than It's Totally Wrong!!

http://www.calendarlive.com/galleriesandmuseums/cl-et-sciarc10jun10,2,5836473.story

LA Times architecture critic, Christopher Hawthorne (another all too recent arrival in LA), last Friday June 10th, proposed that the dispute between SCI-Arc (alas, misspelled - endlessly - in the 'LA' Times as... Sci-Arc) and its landlord be resolved by SCI-Arc leaving its present home and joining the Related Companies Project along Grand Avenue on Bunker Hill. Read the above linked full article, but below are a few of his thoughts:

"Over the last few weeks, two seemingly unrelated architectural dramas have been playing out in downtown Los Angeles.

Inside Department 18 of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the Southern California Institute of Architecture, or Sci-Arc, has been fighting a nasty legal battle over the fate of its single-building campus on the eastern edge of downtown. A decision in the case is expected shortly, perhaps as early as today; a victory for Sci-Arc, allowing it to buy the renovated rail depot it's been leasing for five years, appears unlikely.

Meanwhile, along Grand Avenue, New York-based developer Related Cos. has been working to flesh out and win final approval for a plan to build two huge mixed-use commercial parcels to accompany a 16-acre park. The $1.8-billion project doesn't include a single educational or cultural component or, at least so far, any prominent local architects to complement its roster of established and largely risk-averse firms from Chicago, Boston and New York. Without a change of architectural course, its commercial sections may provide little more than a shiny, joyless parade of high-end chain stores.

Remarkably, there's an attractively simple solution to Sci-Arc's real estate woes and the Related plan's essential conservatism that no one has suggested: Dedicate one of the publicly owned parcels in the new Grand Avenue development for a new, free-standing Sci-Arc campus building, and give the job of designing it to an emerging, experimentally minded architecture firm based in Los Angeles.

In a single stroke, the gesture would give Sci-Arc the permanent home it has been seeking downtown and offer an early sign of reassurance that Related is committed to more than the bottom line. It would bring to the heart of the new development hundreds of architecture students, not to mention audiences for evening lectures, exhibitions and other Sci-Arc events that are open to the public.

More than that, the move would provide the youthful and architectural energy that the project is now lacking.

Sci-Arc's 450 students and 80 faculty members, once in place, could help transform the development from within. Their presence could help attract a diverse mixture of retail outlets as well as, in time, residents who might not otherwise consider living there."

----------------------------------------

Now while I very much like Christopher Hawthorne as a writer, as an architecture critic and as an urban critic (which are three very different things), he is operating under a considerable handicap.

As someone new to Los Angeles, much less downtown, he is not yet fully able to understand the differences between the two neighborhoods (other than the obvious) the cultural history of SCI-Arc (or even how to... spell its name), the financial aspect of the Grand Avenue deal, certain political realties or the true nature of the relationship between Richard Meruelo and SCI-Arc.

To begin with, Hawthorne does not even label SCI-Arc's existing neighborhood as the Arts District - so I am curious how much he actually knows about the long history of that neighborhood. I also wonder if he is at all really aware of just how deeply the arts community and the architecture community have been intertwined in this city - particularly since the 1960's.

I know he must have read in the textbooks about Gehry and the artists and the car culture in Venice, but seeing, living and breathing that relationship is far different than reading about it in a book. From my personal experience, it's no accident that most of the architects I know, I first met in an art gallery - or in an artist's studio.

Nor is it likely that Hawthorne fully appreciates how the loft buildings in the Arts District are places where young architects can afford to live and set-up their practices long after they leave their dorm rooms and thus form a true rather than a merely transitory community; a community where they can daily interact with their peers within the living and working spaces of other visual artists and architects and designers - something that could never happen on Grand Avenue.

Nor does Hawthorne likely fully comprehend that the opportunities for building small projects - and loft remodels - are far larger in this area - making it a potential living showcase for young architects. Nor has he likely considered how the ever endless recycling of (comparatively) inexpensive spaces for shops and restaurants and the newest art gallery will also provide opportunities for upcoming architects in a way that the more homogenized - and far more expensive - retail and restaurant spaces along Grand Avenue would never be able to do.

It is also unlikely Hawthorne is fully aware of the essentially blue collar history of SCI-Arc itself and its old factory building on Beethoven. And he might not be completely cognizant of how perfectly the school fits into its linear space, and how it makes the campus a wonderfully urban/suburban hybrid strip city - the perfect metaphor for the linearity of Los Angeles with its open air freight docks ideal for barbeques and parties and outdoor Southern California living in a way that could never be done on Bunker Hill.

It is obvious that no one could - or would - ever again build a building this way again in the heart of the city - thus making it a uniquely oddball place perfect for human interaction where everyone has to walk through and share and experience everyone else's space to get any where.

No high rise or traditional low rise could or would ever create the sense of community that SCI-Arc now has within its walls; its own community within the heart of a true urban arts community.

As for the Bunker Hill option, Hawthorne neglects to mention that the Colburn School for the Performing Arts is already on Grand Avenue or that Colburn is building a massive expansion far larger than the existing campus - complete with dormitories. Therefore he does not consider how that that will already bring 24/7 student life into the area - along with the students from the arts magnet high school three blocks down, past Grand Avenue's performing arts palaces.

And that synergy is why Colburn belongs on Grand Avenue with the Music Center/Performing Arts Complex and the many theaters and rehearsal halls that are all a perfect complement for Coburn. On Grand Avenue is where performing arts students can find the inspirations and the mentors they need for their careers, and here is where they can daily experience music and dance and drama, making them active participants in this neighborhood in a way that the architecture students at SCI-Arc would never be.

As for the non-social issues of Grand Avenue, Hawthorne seems to be unaware that the land on Bunker Hill is being sold to a developer - and so it can not be given to SCI-Arc by the Country or the CRA.

(UPDATE! - After talking to some more people, it is not impossible that the County could arrange a land gift, but not in the first phase; this still does not, though, make the project any more financially feasible as SCI-Arc would have to build a very expensive campus - far more expensive than buying their existing building. This fact alone fully negates the reason for the move. It simply makes no financial sense to do this, anymore than it makes any social sense.)

There are also a number of other observations and conclusions about Bunker Hill and the Related proposal in the article that are not valid, but my main objections to the site those already stated.

Lastly, the present courtroom antics and the adversarial role playing between Meruelo and SCI-Arc described in the article, makes the true dynamics of what is going on among the principals impossible to know without a first hand knowledge of the players and their pasts, much less their past and present interactions - or their long term goals.

Again, a newcomer to the city can hardly be expected to parse out what is really going on here - much less what is really likely going to happen - as opposed to what is going on in public in the press and in a court room.

Now this returns this cowboy to a well ridden theme - how the ceaseless purge of LA voices from the LA Times by a Chicago corporation and its hired hands who care not one lick about this city... is the major civic tragedy of our time. A local urban critic such as Sam Hall Kaplan would be far less likely to misunderstand a situation like this.

However, on the other hand, when on the very rare occasion where a fait of corporate deus ex machina does give us a true advocate for serous architecture, great urban design - and true urban communities (such as Christopher Hawthorne), at least we can be grateful for that.

And Hawthorne has already shown a passion for his briefly adopted city that his universally despised predecessor, Nicolia Ourooussoff, never bothered to even try and fake. So when one adds to this his willingness to throw out some very exciting ideas to get a public debate going, this makes Hawthorne one of the very few new hires of the Times to add to this city rather than subtract from it, as most of the new hires do (take Steve Lopez - please!).

Hawthorne is a keeper!

In closing, as I said up front, Christopher Hawthorne has a wonderfully thought out idea in proposing to move SCI-Arc to Grand Avenue - other than the simple fact that he's completely and totally wrong.

Sunday, June 12, 2005

West Hollywood Annexes Wilshire Boulevard! Or At Least That Is What The New York Times Says!

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/fashion/sundaystyles/12boit.html?pagewanted=all

Just when the New York Times was reaching a long streak of error free innnings about things LA, they drop a seriously easy infield out - big time - in their 'Boite' article about the restaurant Dominick's:

"Over in the corner the installation artist Jennifer Steinkamp had come with a dozen friends from her art opening at Acme gallery in West Hollywood."

Acme?

In... West Hollywood?

Well, Acme - once called Food House - has been in several places (more if you count Robert Gunderman's first downtown LA effort - Opus as one of its ancestors), but none of them had been in - or are in - West Hollywood. The famed gallery long owned by Robert - don't ever call me Bob - Gunderman and Randy Sommer is presently the keystone tenant at the famed 6150 Wilshire complex just down the street from LACMA (Los Angeles County Museum of Art) - in the heart of Los Angeles' Miracle Mile.

Now this is the type of gaffe one would expect to find in the LA Times... but in the New York Times?

Shocking!

New York Times Take On LA Times Editorial Shake-up!

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-ednote12jun12,0,6629536.story

First, go to the above linked story in the Sunday LA Times Opinion section where Editorial Page Director Andres Martinez described the proposed changes for the editorial page. The bullet points are below:

* There will be a modest cosmetic redesign.

* On occasion, board members will write, under their byline, "A SoCal Life," articles that reflect on life in this region.

* A box on this page, in the letters space, will appear some days, critiquing editorials in other newspapers.

* Analytical editorials that grapple with fundamental principles underlying a policy debate will be labeled "Framework." These will be archived on our website (latimes.com/opinion) and also in a separate outline by subject matter that we hope, over the years, will evolve into a coherent and consistent political philosophy.

* On Saturdays, you may have noticed, this page usually has a unifying theme - say, three editorials on aspects of the weather, or France.

* "Thinking Out Loud" is an experiment in making up our minds in public. Starting with two national issues, immigration and traffic, that are especially important to us in Southern California, we will devote space in all of our precincts - editorials, Op-Eds, the Sunday Opinion section (and watch out for a redesign and name change there!) and our website - to exploring aspects and alternate views of these subjects. We don't have a solution, and there may not be a good one. But that is no excuse for failing to come up with the best one. We hope this process will help us do it.

* We will allow board members to dissent from editorials they disagree with - though only once a year each. Judy Dugan has already used up her 2005 allotment with a strong rebuttal to our editorials endorsing the Republican Senate leadership's efforts to kill the filibuster

* Watch next week for the introduction of "wikitorials" - an online feature that will empower you to rewrite Los Angeles Times editorials.
----------------------------------------------------

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/13/business/media/13lat.html?pagewanted=print

Then go to the above link to see an independent view of the proposed changes by the New York Times. The most interesting points were those taking a skeptical view of Editorial and Opinion Page Editor Michael Kinsley. See below:

"Some at the newspaper have found Mr. Kinsley distant and uncommunicative, saying that he rarely answers internal e-mail messages. They said that situation was not helped by the fact that Mr. Kinsley still primarily lives in Seattle and flies to Los Angeles every other week.

"I'm not known for being uncommunicative," Mr. Kinsley said. "I'm known for being overly communicative. The commuting is working out O.K.. It's not ideal but it's pretty great for me."

(well... as long as it works for... someone)

And...

"Mr. Kinsley is not unaccustomed to controversy. Earlier this year, he got into a bitter public fight with the feminist writer Susan Estrich, a former Harvard Law School classmate, when she tried to get him to run more opinion pieces by women.

Last week, the newspaper's entire editorial column was filled by an unsigned 1,400-word article arguing that malaria does not receive the attention or money it deserves. The article noted that Mr. Kinsley's wife, Patty Stonesifer is co-chairwoman and president of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The foundation is overseeing an anti-malaria campaign, but some of the newspaper's staff thought the article's appearance was a conflict of interest. Mr. Martinez addressed the issue by saying "the idea that we can't bring more attention because the Gates foundation is trying to find a cure is a bit mind boggling."

Interesting, huh? Now as for what LA Cowboy thinks... I don't know. Obviously, the status quo is not working. All we can do is watch, wait - and hope.


New York Times (and LA Daily News) Scoop LA Times... on LA Area Earthquake!

While the New York Times first posted word of the mild (estimated 5.6; UPDATE - now 5.2) Southern California earthquake at 8:59 LA time... it took the LA Times until 9:33 to report the story via the AP wire.

As KAUSFILES says, the LA Times would rather be late, but get in all the details (interviews, etc.) before they report that something has actually happened.

Guys - get a clue!

It's called a NEWS-paper!

UPDATE!

Quote from LA Times AP wire written belated article -

"The quake was felt as far west as Los Angeles and as far south as San Diego, 75 miles southwest of Palm Springs, where hundreds of scientists gathered for a diabetes conference."

Say, what?

"... where hundreds of scientists gathered for a diabetes conference."

I SUPPOSE there is a reason for that factoid to be in the article (maybe AP is now charging clients by the word)... but it sure beats the hell out of me why it's there. And when the NY times later updated with the same AP story, they left out that... fact.

I mean, there are probably a hundred other events going on in that area today - so why list that one? Is there a newly discovered link between earthquakes and... diabetes? Has the wearing of copper braclets suddenly been determined to cause... earthquakes?

Tell us LA Times! Enquiring minds demand to know!

FURTHER UPDATE!!

In the LA Times' latest AP wire update (Still relying on AP for this story? What gives? Not enough money left in the budget for LAT reporters to work on Sundays?)... the Times has dropped the... zzzz.... diabetes convention... zzzz... and added - a NUDIST resort!

Giggling naked bodies!!

Finally - someone at the LA Times who knows their audience!!!

FINAL UPDATE!!!

Two and one-half LA Times reporters later (two credited, one assist), the LA Times has - finally - covered the quake story first hand. Alas, though, there are no first - or even second - hand reports of the affect of the quake's rhythmic swaying on naked bodies at the nudist resort. Instead, the closest thing to moving, naked flesh is the head of a stuffed mule deer falling off a wall.

Sic Transit Gloria.

Even Freakin' Gold Fish Are Scooping LA Cowboy These Days!!

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/on/a_tale_of_two_ledes_22449.asp

Well, if LA Cowboy had nothing better to do with his time than swim around in circles over at FISH BOWL LA, he might actually have time to read the LA Times.

But guess what!

He doesn't!

So while he is busy preparing the NEW LA Cowboy, the old LA Cowboy is now an impotent old crone (if crones can be impotent...) incapable of scooping even.... fish.

So if you want to find out latest screw-up at the LA Times and how they simply just don't understand this city (and couldn't find the lede of a story if it was handed to them in a... fish bowl...), well... you'll have to read it elsewhere.

And, adding to LA Cowboy's never ending shame, not only did he misss the LAT article, but he even misssed the Fish Bowl post (and speaking of Fish Bowl - when am I getting my well deserved prize for the funniest caption in the last KCRW contest?? I mean, it's been almost a month now) and this poor cowboy had to read about THAT two days late in... www.kausfiles.com where Mickey scooped us on YET ANOTHER LA Times snafu...

http://slate.msn.com/id/2120319/

However, LA Cowboy's shame is nothing compared to the shame of the LA Toothless Times. Not only did they blow both of those stories, but they were scooped by the New York Times on stories that were... IN THEIR OWN BACK YARD!!

(last phrase, alas, courtesy of Fish Bowl LA)

Saturday, June 11, 2005

Sleeping Cowboy Screws The Pooch AGAIN!!

First, our ailing cowboy missed how the LA Times managed to leave out the actual story in the John Kerry - finally - releasing his military records story; the fact that Kerry's grades at Yale were even lower than Bush's! And now we equally missed the fact that the LA Times has repeatedly stated that Kerry has/had/will/kinda/sorta released all his military files - when it appears that he has done no such thing - as shown by PATTERICO!

http://patterico.com/2005/06/10/3170/nothing-to-see-here-folks-again/

So these days if you want to know what's really going wrong at the LA Times - you need to go to www.patterico.com or read KAUSFILES or LAOBSERVED.

But fear not!

The long non-awaited revamp and reinvention of LA Cowboy is now only weeks away and once that has transpired - full time coverage of LA Times screwups and cover-ups will resume!

Friday, June 10, 2005

Barry Munitz And The Getty - Reader Response! Or Will Little Eva Make Her Escape Across The Ice Flow!!

If you look back two posts to my musing on the LAT's excellent expose (other than the minor fact that they missed the real story, of course) of Barry Munitz's disastrous tenure at the Getty Museum, you will notice that there are zero comments.

Zip.

But I did get some e-mails.

Quite a few e-mails.

In fact - lots of e-mails.

And they are still coming.

And tonight the phone calls started.

Some are anonymous, but many are willing to give their names to establish their credibility, as long as I do not post who they are or give the identifying specifics of what they are saying. But their stories are all the same.

First picture the spawn of hotel heiress Leona Helmsley and Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology. Then picture the bad seed spawn of that spawn breeding with Marie Antoinette's evil twin sister. Then picture that spawn running the Getty.

The climate of fear and hatred up on the hill is considerably worse than the Times could ever communicate in cold print.

But... when it comes to the feelings of the refugees from the hill, well... when the revolution comes, Mr. Munitz will be lucky to keep his head. There are plenty of peasants out there with pitch forks and torches ready to storm the gates of the Getty.

Antonio Villaraigosa Pledges To Involve Neighborhood Councils In New Planning Director Search!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-plan10jun10,1,7912530.story?coll=la-headlines-california

Today's LA Times reports that Mayor-elect Antonio Villaraigosa has agreed to honor Mayor Hahn's pledge for us to be involved in the selection of the new planning director for the City of Los Angeles. Mayor Hahn had proposed that each NC appoint a member to a city wide body and then that body would select seven reps - one from each planning district. Those seven would then question the final three applicants for the job.

Hopefully, the NC's will shortly be able to have a meeting with the Mayor-elect and/or top staff members to discuss the details of our involvement in the process.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

Greed At The Getty! LA Times (Partially Redeems Itself) - But STILL Misses The Big Picture!!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-getty10jun10,0,4932458.story?coll=la-home-headlines

While the LA Times does a superb, wonderfully researched job of showing how Barry Munitz has looted the Getty for his own personal gain (and I have to admit that his borderline crimes are pretty entertainingly... Baroque)... the Times inexplicably ignores the two aspects of the story that most impact this city.

First, on the plus side, the LA Times impeccably covers and documents the over-the-top payments made by Munitz to friends and people he wanted to impress. But what the Times does not adequately cover, is the tendency of the Getty (i.e., Barry Munitz, since the two are now seemingly virtually the same entity) to fund very expensive projects everywhere in the world but in Los Angeles.

For years Munitz has been quietly cursed by many in the local art world for cutting off resources that could have helped comparatively art poor Los Angeles while he continued to rain down money around the world, making him a jet-set player in both the international art and social worlds.

But far worse than that, is the disgraceful record of art acquisitions under Munitz. As masterpiece after masterpiece - including some of the last examples by some of history's greatest painters have come to the auction block - in almost every case - the Getty has not even been a bidder. And with a finite number of these masterpieces left, the last chance for Los Angeles to have a world class pre-20th Century art museum is about to vanish forever under Munitz's reign.

And yet this fact - the one fact that is of most interest to art lovers in Los Angeles, and the only fact that has any long term impact on the civic life of LA is... totally unmentioned!

Only the (cough, cough) LA Times could write this story and totally focus on petty graft, and then miss the long term impacts of Munitz's policies on the city’s cultural life. But I guess since no one at the Times plans on being in LA for more than a few years, anyway - why should they care about the future of this city?

What is mentioned, though, is that even though the LA Getty has a very minor painting collection by international - or even national - standards, Munitz now wants to consider building multiple Getty's around the world, dispersing the already inadequate collection.

Also mentioned is the almost total freedom Munitz has been given to run with Getty by the 13 trustees - a number of whom live in on the East Coast, particularly in New York. But what it is not mentioned, is that they only meet four times a year - and that even then, it is not always in Los Angeles.

And, equally not mentione, is that most of these trustees have been virtually hand picked up Munitz, making the board simply an extension of his social life rather than a true board. The non-mention of these last facts is particularly puzzling as the Times has in the past called attention to these defects, and these defects are clearly the underlying reason for the problems that the article does address.

I can only hope that follow up articles are already written - or at least, planned. One needs to be done on the failure of the board to function... as an independent board or as a board that is run by people who live in this city. And another follow-up is needed ASAP by Christopher Knight on the disastrous legacy of Munitz in not building a museum.

To repeat myself, what was in the article was brilliantly done. But what was not in the article, was totally inexcusable... unless parts 2 and 3 of the story are to shortly follow.

Otherwise, the LA Times will once again have brilliantly told a story - except that it wasn't the story that should have been told.

Lastly, is it too much to hope that the LA Time writes an editorial calling for the head of Barry Munitz - and demanding that the Getty Board be immediately reconstituted with arts world professionals and LA based public watchdogs rather than asleep at the wheel social friends of the director?

Well... since you ask - yes!

It is far, far too much to expect.

Kausfiles Scoops Cowboy On LA Times AGAIN!!

http://slate.msn.com/id/2120319/

While LA Cowboy struggles with his latest dopamine drop... KAUSFILES continues to do the barely functioning Cowboy's work by raking the LA Times over the coals of its own making.

In the Los Angeles Times story about the release of Kerry's Navy records - they declared there was... nothing of interest! So while the rest of the national - and local – media gleefully ran with the story that John Kerry's grades at Yale were actually slightly LOWER than President Bush's - that fact was totally omitted in the LA Times article!

So if that's how they edit Kerry stories now - imagine what they were leaving out during the campaign - or what they leave out in any other campaign when covering one of 'their' candidates.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Daily News Goes Wild On DWP & Neighborhood Council Story! Total Madness Ensues!!

In a breaktakingly incorrect article on the front page, the Daily News yesterday headlined, "Surprise! 4.3% Hike for water?", it describes how the DWP has - supposedly - broken its promises to the Neighborhood Councils about an independent financial review.

This is totally and completely...wrong.

Now unlike the NC members quoted, I was at the very first meeting with Jerry Gewe well over a year ago when we first signed an agreement to agree on a MOU, and then after fifty meetings, I was also on the final negotiating team who worked with Ron Deaton on the last changes to the language of the document.

And Ron Deaton and the LADWP have fulfilled every single promise they have made to us - and even more so.

We have known all along that more money was going to be needed to deal with both improved water quality control standards and for post 9/11 security concerns. We have also been kept informed of the status of the budget every step of the way with repeated briefings.

We also know that a budget has to be proposed and adopted with a recommendation for needed revenue increases BEFORE the independent audit can take place to see if this is justified. And we also know that the rate increase will not be formally proposed, much less voted on, until the budget is approved. And then we will be given the 90 days to study proposal

Now how any one article can get so many facts in it dead wrong - I do not know.

UPDATE!!

Special City Council Committee meeting today (June 14th) to investigate if the DWP was following the rules of proper notification of an rate increase to the neighborhood councils. A number of us spoke - and we vindicated them. Then the reporter who wrote the above story - on a very short deadline, she said - interviewed us all and very graciously apologized for the parts of the story she had gotten wrong.

Class act!

Hunger In Los Angeles - Fact - Or Fraud? Or... Mothers... Don't Let Your Boys Grow Up To Be Bruins!

http://martinirepublic.com/la.php

Challenged by Joseph over at Martini Republic's latest new festering sore of a site - (which, of course, I mean in only the nicest way, see above link), for fellow bloggers to examine the hunger story in the LA Times and Daily News, my carefully evaluated judgment is that the story is... strictly from hunger.

Let's start with the first line of the LAT's article:

"Hunger and poor nutrition are increasing in California, with nearly 3 million low-income adults reporting that they struggle each day to keep food on the table, according to a study released Tuesday by UCLA researchers."

OK - the operative phrase here is - "struggle each day to keep food on the table".

Then let's go a little deeper, scratch that, more accurately, let's go further into the article:

"In Los Angeles, 34% of low-income adults - about 957,000 people - experienced periods when they could not afford enough food in 2003, up from 31% in 2001."

OK - so which is it - these surveyed people daily struggle to feed themselves as it states in the lede, - or they experienced periods (of no specified length - one day - two days - three hours - fifteen minutes) when they could not afford enough food.

These are two very different things.

Now based on having reviewed the questions and methodology of many surveys that were heavily biased to create a desired result, my very totally off-the-cuff opinion is that this study is largely bogus. But I would, of course, need to see the actual survey myself to see how much it created this 'growing' hunger problem.

However, based on my personal experience, I feed myself on 3 to 4 dollars a day, when I have to, 5 dollars on an average day and around 6 dollars a day on a very good day. Now I do not buy processed or packaged foods or expensive fast foods, nor do I buy wine or beer. I am also not addicted to drugs and the only people I ever regularly see who do not have the money for food in my neighborhood, are those who use all their money to buy drugs or alcohol. And that is a not insubstantial percentage of the very poor in this city.

I also shop only in low income stores (downtown, Pico-Union, McArthur Park) and when I see people buying with food stamps, most of the time - they have plenty of cash to buy non-essential, alcohol and plenty of pre-packaged foods. And this is something I observe on a daily basis. Only once in a great, great while do I see an older man or woman strugling with a decision if they can afford an item when they come up to the cash register, and then I try to slip them a dollar or so, but more often then not, they refuse it.

Plus in the heart of the skid row district where I live and work, the biggest problem is diabetes from over-eating as even the homeless can easily score five hot meals a day by going from mission to mission. Now that is not to say that there aren't families that do have periods of time they might not have as much food as they want at the end of the month. I have that, too.

Now is there some on-going hunger in LA County? And is this something we need to concern ourselves with? No question! But first we need to be truthful about the realities of the problem, and the true underlying reasons for that hunger.

And from daily watching the way people shop in the local markets, and by daily talking with and living among these people and by watching the hugely obese younger children in the poorest neighborhoods in the city, I can really see the poor nutrition part. But do I actually believe there are substantial numbers of people permanently nightly going to bed hungry?

My carefully rendered opinion is - bullshit!

UPDATE --

Just read Daily News article - and get a load of this quote:

"The report makes a distinction between what it calls food insecurity, or being at risk of going hungry, and hunger, in which adults actually complained of being hungry or missing meals on several occasions."

So... if you have ever been hungry or if you have ever even missed meals on several occasions, then you are apart of the hard core hungry category. But, besides them, there are those people who aren't hungry and who never miss meals (if the paper is accurately reporting thier criteria) - but there is the chance that they might at some time in the future, just maybe might miss a meal or feel hungry. And they are also listed as being among the millions of hungry people in California.

So to use those definitions to create a 'hunger crisis' in LA - is beyond bullshit. It is deliberate and blatant dishonestly.

Kausfiles Reaps While LA Cowboy Sleeps While LA Times... Remains Asleep At The Wheel!

http://slate.msn.com/id/2120319/

After an all night writing session, LA Cowboy missed checking the LA Times and so KAUSFILES scooped us by noticing that the four hour shut down of a major freeway - which gridlocked a large part of greater Los Angeles was buried on page three of their 'B' section. This even though the Daily News - which does not even service the area most affected - had it on their front page (and the story was covered by the National version of NBC news). To quote KAUSFILES:

Update: The L.A. Daily News, the LAT's smaller, Valley-based rival, of course makes the freeway drama its lead story. That's because the Daily News is a newspaper. [As opposed to?--ed. A giant wet blanket smothering any spark of civic engagement in America's second-largest city! ... Sorry, that just sort of popped out.]

Sunday, June 05, 2005

LA Times Has Blog! Sort of...

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/weblog/oped/archives/2005/06/steinblog_loveh_1.html#comments

The above link will take you to a very limited blog at the LA Times on which we are allowed to post on only two subjects - parents and students in school, and your opinion of Joel Stein.

Joel, who?

Yes, I know. No one knows who he is, which is why they are plugging him on their blog. And as I suspected, since only his friends know who he is, they seem to be the only ones posting so far. However, with all the major plugs this blog has gotten in the blogosphere, I am amazed at how few posts there have been.

Lastly, since the TIMES edits and reviews before they publish posts, here is my uncensored post below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


As for the alleged convergence of Joel Stein and humor, I understand the basis of the theoretical construct. Take a self-identified loser, have him make deliberately pompous and idiotic statements about other people - and then label it cutting edge satire.

Hey, it worked for Pauly Shore - so why not the Times?

The problem with this particular theory is that the few people who appreciate this type of humor - would never be caught dead reading the LA Times.

As partial proof of this, I write a blog that is partly about the LA Times; I am also in the film and TV business; I also wrote and sold many TV pilots back in the day; and, yet, I have not once heard one person mention Joel Stein. And even when I called around to people I know who would be in his target audience and I asked them what they thought about Joel Stein - out of twenty people, not a one of them knew who he was.

There is an even larger problem, though. There are many people in LA who might be interested in the story of a so far unsuccessful sit-com writer trying to make it Hollywood. Unfortunately, though, the LA times will only hire people who are not from LA and who know nothing about LA to write about LA, which is why no one in LA cares about the LA Times.

Anything to do with LA has been deliberately extracted from the paper.

This is why we have do not have a column about a writer who grew up in LA and has many common shared experiences with Angelinos. This is why the paper is filled with stories about Red Socks/Yankee fans.

Now a column by someone who has spent years dealing with the ins and outs of the Hollywood might make for an entertaining read. But a column filled with cultural references that mean nothing to people to LA - will be ignored, just like the rest of the LA Times.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/weblog/oped/archives/2005/06/steinblog_loveh_1.html#comments

Saturday, June 04, 2005

LA Times Covers DLANC's Town Crier Competition!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-crier5jun05,0,3680365.story?coll=la-home-local

The LAT's Calendar section has an excellent article on the Downtown Los Angeles's Neighborhood Council's Town Crier Competition. It tells how our very own town crier - Don Garza - became first DLANC's and then LA's town crier and how he arranged the competition.

Friday, June 03, 2005

Neighborhood Councils? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Neighborhood Councils!

Recently released from City Hall is a ten (or nine, depending on the format) page document entitled:

A Fresh Start - The Villaraigosa Administration - Preliminary/Executive Summary May 31, 2005.

In it the new mayor states his overall philosphy about Los Angeles. He opines on schools, jobs, police, city commissions, traffic, ethics, fire, public safety, civil rights, terrorist attacks, ambulances, business, taxes, and many other subjects.

But there are two words that do not even appear in this statement about his Fresh Start - Neighborhood Councils.

This was definitely not what LA Cowboy was expecting as a one year anniversary gift from the new adminstration.

Maybe all the NC's should marshall our meager resources and buy our new Mayor a copy of the old city charter.

Thursday, June 02, 2005

College Term Paper On Brady Westwater - Four Pages For ONLY - $39.80!!

The things you learn when you have a GOOGLE news alert on your name.

There is a a four page essay for sale on-line about my views on Mike Davis and it can be yours for the bargain price of only $39.80!!

Hell, I 'll pump four pages myself on any subject you want for half the price!!!


https://secure.the-paper-store.com/order/orderf.php?site=www.papergeeks.com&tdw=400&PaperID=251847351

Cowboys Lasso Drug Dealer in Heart of Downtown!

Well, maybe not exactly... cowboys... and no lasso was actually used except in the figurative sense - but two Stetsoned members of the LAPD mounted unit apprended a drug dealer at 5th and Spring in front of the notorious Alexandria hotel this afternoon. And one of the horses assisting in the arrest was a quite fine looking almost near black Morgan.

I mention that because the first two chapters of LA Cowboy's soon be be excerpted here memoirs are largely about LA Cowboy's own black Morgan horse and their somewhat... rocky... initial relationship.

Stay tuned!

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Happy Birthday LA Cowboy! One Year Old Today!!

Or at least that's what the LA Times reporter said to me at the crack of dawn this morning. And then I checked out this disturbing claim, I discovered that he/she was right! I am one year old today!

LA Cowboy was born precisely one year ago. And then when two other LA Times reporters called - also at a time they both knew I would still be asleep - it was clear that there was a conspiracy afoot to deprive LA Cowboy of his sleep - leaving him unable to battle the forces of evil!

So, now aware of the significance of the day, I checked my e-mails to see if there were yet any congratulatory messages from either the Editor or the Publisher of the Times.

Nope!

Not yet.

But the day is young!

The wonderful irony of this is, of course, how many reporters at the LA Times appreciate LA Cowboy's views on the leadership of the LA Times, not that any of them would ever dare comment on my site or call me from a LA Times number, of course. In fact, even some bloggers say that can not leave any comments on my site for fear of never being able to write for the Times again.

As for the future of LA Cowboy, well, big changes are in store!

The original plan was to comment on the new Neighborhood Council movement and other aspects of LA life. But, when I was quite unexpectedly elected president of my own neighborhood council, I realized that blogging on the day to day activities of my own council - when I was its president - would make for an awkward situation; thus, after a period of hibernation, I decided to write a more general view of the city and the NC's.

But as I was doing this, from stage far left, entered the villain of the drama, The LA Times! And LA Cowboy found its first true voice; keeping track of the errors, omissions and general cluelessness of the LA Times.

But now that LA Cowboy is entering its adolescent, it is time for another change. There is a new Mayor, a slightly reconstituted city council and much work to be done in fixing the City of LA.

So - shortly - besides continuing to battle the forces of evil Chicago has brought to besiege our city - the main focus of this blog will be the interaction of the Neighborhood Councils, the City Council - and the new Mayor.

And, even more than that, it will be a place where the serious issues that face this city can be examined in detail and then debated with a soon to debut new format!

So watch out! A new improved LA Cowboy is headed straight for you!

So... Cowboy Up!

Monday, May 30, 2005

Villaraigosa's Transition Team - And The Neighborhood Councils

Looking at the complete list of new mayor's transition team members - thanks to Kevin at LA Observed - none of the more vocal leaders of the Neighborhood Council movement are listed, to no one's great surprise. However, two of the listed members, Cecelia Moreno of Wilmington, and Dahila Sotelo of Eagle Rock are identified solely by their NC stakeholdership, though as they have a low profile outside of their own councils (at least within the citywide NC movement), I suspect they also have other stakeholderships that have additionally qualified them for their positions.

Besides them, however, at least one other member of the team who is not identified as NC board members is well known within the movement. Michael Delijani of my own council - the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council.

Not a bad start.

Sunday, May 29, 2005

Mayor Villaraigosa and the Neighborhood Councils.

Mayor Villaraigosa and the Neighborhood Councils

It is no secret that the new mayor has not - at least until now - been a supporter of the neighborhood council movement. It is also not a secret that most of the leaders of the NC's who have worked on city wide issues supported either Hertzberg or Hahn. Nor is it a secret that many of those most dedicated to making the neighborhood council system work are hoping that new Mayor will be a failure and that some few are planning on being the not so loyal opposition.

I, however, fully disagree with that.

Anyone who has any interest in making this city work needs to support the new Mayor in any way we can. It is in our own self-interest to help him become the most successful mayor can be.

That is not to say that we will - or should - support him on issues where we disagree with him, but it does mean that we need to work with him to make his term in office a success. And when it comes time for us to disagree with him on an issue, it is up to us to try and find a middle ground, a compromise that both sides will be able to support.

And I am confident that once AV sees that the NC's will meet him more than half way, he will welcome us at city hall just as the Mayor Hahn did and that we will be able to continue to work together for the betterment of the city.

Has LA Times Sold Out To GM?

Personally, I don't have a clue. But someone thinks so....

http://takebackthetimes.blogspot.com/2005/05/its-high-time-that-dan-neil-started.html

Saturday, May 28, 2005

Great Story In Sunday Times Sports Section!

Those of you who do not read the LA Times sports section (or those far larger numbers who do not read the LA Times, period), will miss an excellent story this Sunday by Bill Plaschke. It tells the simple story of a small town little league umpire who after 34 years of service to the sport, discovers he is dying of four kinds of cancer, and the response to this by the community.

It is plainly and simply and elegantly written. And it breaks your heart and reinforces your belief in the goodness of people.

Read it.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/printedition/la-sp-plaschke29may29,1,5032875.column?coll=la-headlines-pe-sports

Also in the paper that day is Steve Lopez's follow-up column on a mentally ill homeless man on skid row. It's not a bad column.

But it is as much about the columnist as it is about the person he is profiling and the writer's words often get in the way of the story. In one paragraph a rat is as big as a meatloaf and in another paragraph the cockroaches are now the size of Volkswagens. The metaphors and the similes call attention to themselves and the writer, not to the story or the man the story is about.

Again, it is not a bad column. But in a just world, a man like Bill Plaschke would write a LA Times column about the people of Los Angeles and Steve Lopez would be back in Philadelphia.

Monday, May 23, 2005

Paul Ricoeur Dead.

The greatest philosopher of the 20th Century, if not any century, passed away on May 20th.

Despite his being French – and two words I normally never want to hear in a paragraph, much less a sentence are, philosopher and French - Paul Ricoeur had a better understanding of the human animal than anyone I have ever read.

If you want a real intellectual 'E' ticket ride - tackle (and that is the appropriate verb) his two greatest works, both written while he was teaching at the University of Chicago, The Rule of Metaphor and the three-volume Time and Narrative.

Your mind will be left spinning for years.

Saturday, May 21, 2005

Scary Example Of How The Web Can Deceive!

Read the below story, then click on the printable version link:

http://www.newturfers.com/mwf/attach/38/355838/BBCNEWSWorldLionMutilates42MidgetsinCambodianRing-Fight.htm

Superb Journalism in... LA Times!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lisker22may22-b,0,7724040.story?coll=la-home-headlines

In the above linked story, LA Times staff reporters Scott Glover and Matt Lait, hit the trifecta. Superb writing, great story telling and masterful investigative reporting.

There's nothing more for me to say. Just go read it!

Have Kids Going To Public School? Be Very, Very, Afraid.

Below is a post from a website I shall not mention:


A Quick Lesson

jacaranda.JPG I hate, hate, HATE to hear Spanish words grossly misprounounced.

There's a certain degree of mispronunciation I expect from gueros and other non-Spanish speakers. I give you about a 20% margin of error. I've had my last name mispronounced since kindergarten and it no longer bugs me, in fact I'm surprised if it's pronounced correctly (and the person isn't Latino).

Every spring I hear dozens of people mispronouncing a certain word and exceeding my 20% margin of error. The primary culprit?

Jacaranda.

You know, those lovely trees with purple blossoms.

Now, for some of you, this word sounds like Jack-a-RAN-dah and rhymes with Miranda.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The mispronunciation of jacaranda bugs me to no end. It is not JACK-aranda. It should not sound like the name of the non-existant son of my neighbors, the Aranda family.

Let me give all you kids who failed Spanish in high school, took French/German or some Asian language instead, or were high during college-level Spanish courses a quick little lesson.

The J is never pronounced like it is in English. Ever. In Spanish a J is pronounced like an 'h'.

Most words have the stress on the penultimate syllable, unless otherwise noted through an accent on a vowel (i.e. ángeles).

All you Spanish-challenged non-Latinos (and some Latinos too), say it with me:

ha-kah-RAN-dah

I expect everyone to pronounce jacaranda correctly from now on. If you don't, I might kick you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course, as anyone who grew up in LA when the 'education' part was still important in 'public education' (as opposed to current 'public indoctrination' system) knows, jacarandas are from... Brazil. And Brazil was colonized by Portugal and not Spain, which is why the streets of Lisbon and not Madrid are lined with jacarandas.

Hence, jackaranda is a Portugese word and not a Spanish word. And if you look in any dictionary, it will show you that the 'J' in jackaranda is NOT silent in either Portguese or English. And even if you did not know this, it would seem that any person before making such a pompous post just might check to see if he or she was wrong.

As for why this post is so scary - especially to us ex-Bruins, is that the author is a graduate student in the UCLA School of Education and Information Studies and works as a research assistant.

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Not Only Does The LA Times Continue To Hide Its Corrections From the Public...

... but in today's (as always) well hidden corrections section, after you finally find it - rather than a very partial list of the Times' daily errors - there is instead a long article on corrections reform. But not on the long needed reform of the LA Times' corrections policy, but on juvenile prison corrections reform!***

That's right! Now I don't know what is more ironic, that the editors of the LA Times do not know the difference between the state’s corrections system and their own corrections section - or the fact that twelve year olds in lock-up could do a better job of proof reading than the editors of the LA Times - or the fact that the LA Times' hiding of its errors from its readers should be addressed by the criminal justice system.

But the fact remains that if you want to read about the ever increasing screw-ups of the LA Times on this particular day, instead of looking at the side bar and clicking on the corrections section like one used to be able to do, you now have to go to the very, very bottom of the LA Times' website, and then sort through FOUR columns, each of which is separately alphabetized and then search for the ONLY item in that very last column that is not in alphabetical order to find the LA Times' corrections page.

And then ... even after all of that... one still has to read through an entire news article about the California Correctional Peace Officer's Association before one can find the actual corrections section below that article!

And, of course, as usual, under the new policy of the LA Times, only the corrections for one day are listed, instead of a full weeks worth of corrections that used to appear on the website.

Way to go LA Times!

UPDATE! 2:30 PM

I just checked and the LA Times is still running the wrong corrections - penal, and not venal - on its corrections page.

***
UPDATE! 3:50 PM LA Times - finally - notices that it has a story on the State Department of Corrections on its Daily Corrections page - and removes it. Not that anyone saw it, of course, as well hidden as their new corrections page is....

Saturday, May 14, 2005

LA Times Discovers Hurricanes Hit Florida... Every 12 Years!

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-hurricane14may14,0,2802301.story?coll=la-home-nation

The below is a quote from the Saturday Los Angeles Times:

"... one of the main lessons learned last year was that Florida was not immune to hurricanes. Until then, the last hurricane to plow ashore had been Andrew in 1992."

No hurricane hit Florida between 1992 and 2004? Did I just read that correctly. Let us look again at that last phrase to see if that is what it really says:

"... the last hurricane to plow ashore had been Andrew in 1992."

Yup. That's what the LA Times said!

And you wonder why they felt thay had to hide the 'Corrections' section on the new website? Well, wonder no more.

Friday, May 13, 2005

LA Times HIDES Its Corrections From the Public!!

While I concur that the new redesign of the LA Times website is an improvement and while I agree that the decision to remove the Calendar section from behind the iron curtain is a positive step, there are still some problems.

Now I don't know if other people are having this problem, but this poor old cowboy with his poor old computers, can no longer access the past weeks editions under the print section. I only get the current day's paper when I click on any of the past week editions.

But that - I assume - is just temporary glitch, or possibly a problem that only my poor old software has. My big problem, though, is that the corrections page now only lists the corrections made on that day!

Yes, that's right! The LA Times has eliminated ALL the corrections made in the prior week that they used to post in that section!!

In addition, rather than having the 'Corrections' link listed on the sidebar - the link is now buried in the other sections section at the very, very bottom of the page and that section is the ONLY section that is not listed in correct alphabetical order. And even then, the corrections link is listed in the very last column - making the link now almost impossible to even find. And even then - in the LA Times, the letter 'c', now comes between the letters 't' and 's'!

As usual, Truth is something that the Los Angeles Times must make absolutely, positively certain is always kept from its readers!!!

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Gallery Row One Year Celebration! Thursday May 12th - Noon - 10 PM Party on Main and Spring Streets!

Gallery Row Organization is pleased to announce its One Year Anniversary Party to be held at M.J. Higgins (244 S. Main St., LA, CA 90012) on May 12, 2005 with 14 galleries being open along Main and Spring Streets!

Also, in conjunction with the Downtown Art Walk (www.downtownartwalk.com), Gallery Row (www.galleryrow.org) is holding a special event from 12PM-10PM at the CalTrans Building, located 1 block north of M.J. Higgins on Main Street between 1st and 2nd.

Gallery Row Organization Presents - CalTrans Art Fest

Curated and organized in conjunction with Gallery Row Organization

By LILLI MULLER

Bands:

12:00 PM ANAND BENNET (Experimental Jazz)

4:30 PM KILLSONIC

5:30 PM BODIE (David Dutton and Band)

7:00 PM THE TAMALES (Alberto Rayes and Band) (sound and projections)

8:00 PM ANNI ROSSI (violin)

8:30 PM JOE BAIZAS BAND- FEATURING LA POET DENNIS CRUZ

AND PAUL URIAZ

INTERACTIVE POETRY: ED ROSENTHAL PRESENTS RENEGADE POETS to be performing at CalTrans and along the Downtown Art Walk, sponsored by Gallery Row Organization and Bert Green Fine Art.

ART EXHIBIT: Moving art Kiosks (3 scaffolds showing works by downtown artists and photographers)

ARTISTS: Emmeric Konrad, Adam Harteau (5pm - 10pm), Erik James, Peter Romberg, Brad Davis, David Mark Patterson, Brandon Taylor, Dave and the Horsepainters

SPECIAL INTERACTIVE PROJECTION PROJECT:

‘SHADOW PUPPETS’ by RICK ROBINSON

(Projections facing Main St. with handheld cutouts for the audience to participate)

INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE INSTALLATION:

‘love thy neighbor’ by LILLI MULLER

Raw white body casts of people sitting leaning and standing on the steps and along the plaza as part of the crowd

EVOLVING SCULPTURE INSTALLATION FOR THE DAY AND NIGHT

by ERIK JAMES and PETER ROMBERG

PAINTING INSTALLATION by CINDY LOPEZ

PROJECTIONS (starting 7pm-10pm)

ARTISTS: Launa Bacon, Brian Lotti, Mark Oberhofer, Erik James

In July 2003, Los Angeles City Council designated Main and Spring Streets between 2nd and 9th Streets in Downtown Los Angeles as Gallery Row. Designed to increase arts and culture in the area, Gallery Row was formally introduced to the public at an unveiling ceremony hosted by Council Member Jan Perry and sponsored by the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council in May 2004.

Since Gallery Row’s unveiling, the district has grown from 4 art galleries to 14 with more to come in the newly designated arts corridor. The Downtown Art Walk, sponsored by Gallery Row Organization and Bert Green Fine Art, has brought thousands of Angelenos to rediscover the Historic Downtown and its new charms.
Downtown Art Walk participating galleries and museums: 2nd Street Cigars & Gallery, 626 Gallery, Bank, Bert Green Fine Art, Downtown Art Gallery, El Nopal Press, Gallery 727, The Hive Gallery, Infusion Gallery, Iron Eye Gallery, Kristi Engle Gallery, LA Artcore Center, M.J. Higgins, MOCA (Grand Avenue), Museum of Neon Art (MONA), Modern Art Downtown, Los Angeles Center for Digital Art, Pharmaka, and sixspace.

You can find more information at www.galleryrow.org and www.downtownartwalk.com, such as locations, parking, and special event schedules.

Gallery Row is continuing the tradition of revitalizing downtown into a culturally significant urban neighborhood. For that reason alone, this event is not to be missed!

SPECIAL THANKS:

CalTrans and Jim Hammer for their support of this project and the Gallery Row Organization.

DEW Foundation

Mark Walsh & the Downtown Artists Project Ad Hoc Committee of the Arts, Aesthetics, Culture & Education Committee of the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council, for their continuing support of the artistic community.

Hpnotiq and Whaler's Rum

Monday, May 09, 2005

LA Times Shameless Slanting Of The News To Support Their Candidate!

Its the recall election all over again!

First there was slanted LA TIMES poll (and no one does it better than they do) showing the recall in trouble - when every other poll showed the opposite. Then there was the last minute poll showing the recall in better shape, but still presented in such a way as to cast doubt on the outcome. And - then - the true speciality of the LA Times - any time the candidate they oppose has good news - then the LA Times HAS juxtapose it with another article to counteract the good news.

And, sure enough, directly below the 'Hahn gains ground story', is a massive story that tries to descredit Hahn that could have been run on any day in the past few weeks, but which was held until it was needed. See below:

Hahn Gains Ground, but Villaraigosa Still Leading
By Michael Finnegan
TIMES POLL: The mayor makes inroads among likely black and Valley voters, but his foe still holds an 11-point lead.
• Ad Blitz Attacks Hahn's Record

Hahn Ally Gets Contracts, Influence
By Noam N. Levey, Patrick McGreevy, Deborah Schoch
Niholas Tonsich's law firm benefited from his connections to the mayor.

And, yes -- that is EXACTLY (or as exactly as cut and paste can be) as it reads on the LA Times website at this moment.

One positive headline/story - followed by two negative. It might be a coincidence, of course, except that this same pattern held true over and over again during the recall. And both of these particular stories just happen to be totally under the control of the LA Times, unlike stories such as the Miami donations which another newspaper broke, making their timing and positioning of these two new stories even more suspect.

New York Times Takes Steps To Build Credibility... LA Times Asks...

... what's credibility?

In the below linked story, the New York Times surveyed its readers and discovered that only 21% of its readers believed all or most of whaat they read in the paper, while 14% believed almost... nothing. I can only imagine what the figures would be for the LA Times.

It also cites a Pew study saying that 45% of all Americans believe little or nothing of what they read in their daily newspaper. As for the NYT's proposed efforts to improve the image of their paper, about half of the effort seems to be PR to make us think its a better paper while the other half is actually devoted to making it a better paper.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/09/business/media/09paper.html?hp&ex=1115697600&en=1462a10c42186ac7&ei=5094&partner=homepage

Friday, May 06, 2005

Moronic Newscaster Remark of the Night! Hell, Make that - the Year!!

Paul Moyer - Channel Four News - just announced that the Russians opposed Bush's visit to Latvia as it might spark a desire for independence in Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania!

Sounds like he's ready for the editorial board of the LA Times!!

Thursday, May 05, 2005

LA Times Circulation COLLAPSE Even Worse Than Previously Thought!!

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000910794

The above link is to Editor and Publisher's website. And I quote from the start of the article here:

"NEW YORK In her report this week on the new Fas-Fax circulation numbers from the Audit Bureau of Circulations, Merrill Lynch analyst Lauren Rich Fine observed that circulation declines, already bad enough at some papers, looked even worse when you broke out the "50% or greater paid" category. She noted that in Q1 conference calls, many newspaper companies had indicated that they were trying to reduce the under-50% and "other paid" segments "in an effort to win advertisers over with their resulting 'quality' circulation." But some of these new Fas-Fax numbers are "seemingly in direct conflict with some company remarks," she wrote."

And guess which paper has the largest circulation decline of ANY major newspaper of people who actually pay for the newspaper? Yup - the LA Times! In fact, it the Times has the second worst figure quoted of ANY newspaper in the country!! A staggering 12.9 % decline! That means that almost 13% of the people who even paid half-price or more for their subscriptions - stopped subscribing!! At this rate, soon the LA Times have to pay people to read it!

UPDATE --

The first figure below shows the decline of the daily circulation in subscribers who pay 50% or more for their subscriptions for the LA Times, and the second figure shows the overall decline. But... the prevous number given for the weekly decline by the LA Times was... 6.5% and not 7.7%. Will check into this.

Los Angeles Times -12.9 (-7.7)

UPDATE TO UPDATE!!

Editor and Publisher got back to me about the dueling figures for LA Times daily subscription numbers within - minutes! - and will check out the differences between the numbers. Journalism at its best!!

UPDATE TO UPDATE TO UPDATE!!!

These appear to be raw figures for the overall weekday circulation for the LA TImes:

In March 2004 the Times in the official "fas-fax" listed its daily circ as: 983,727

But in the latest fas-fax, it's figure for the previous March had been reduced to 970,802 (after taking that offical "reduction")

Its March 2005 number is: 907,997

Hence the difference between the 6.5% and the 7.7%. Now as far as the percentage reduction in people who pay 50% or more, since those numbers would not be 'reduced' (one would asume) since they are actually paying customers and not 'bogus' circulation, the 12.9% drop in those numbers would appear not to be affected. But will have more on this tomorrow.

Monday, May 02, 2005

LA Times Circulation Collapse Speeds UP! Is The End... Near??

After a 5.5% drop in circulation was rumored a short time ago, the actual figures are now out. The LA Times has had its Monday - Saturday circulation drop by 6.5% from the prior year's six month reporting period (which ended March 31st, 2005) and its Sunday circulation has dropped by 7.9%! It looks as if the rate of decline speeded up at the end of this period!

Plus the weekly figure is now down to 907,997! Can the 800,000's be far behind? Or even... the 700,000's? Not as long as the LA Times' five layers of editors and filters keep approving error-filled stories written by New York, Philadelphia and Chicago journalists!

Keep up the good work!

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050502/lam103.html?.v=8

Sunday, May 01, 2005

LSD In LA Times Water Supply? What Else Can Explain Bizarre Article On Vietnam?

Since others have covered the mind-altering prose of the David Lamb authored article on Vietnam on the front page of the Saturday LA Times, I was going to skip it until I belatedly read the superb Sunday coverage in the New York Times.

I also have to admit that I originally never got past the LA Times headline and the first few paragraphs of the Saturday story since it was so obvious that whom ever had written the article about the events of the 1960's and 1970's must have also availed himself of some - if not all - of the drugs so plentiful in those times before he wrote it.

But as bad - and dishonest - as the article is - the most bizarre point was the sub-headline of the article which read, in part:

"... the firmly communist nation has a flourishing economy, social freedom and deep ties with the U.S."

Honest!

I am not making this up!

Now if you have any knowledge of what is happening economically in Vietnam, the current boom is fueled by a total rejection of communist ideology and a complete embrace of Adam Smith and free market capitalism! This is a firmly communist nation? Bullshit!

And the wonderful irony is that for eleven years Vietnam was a firmly communist country until it was on the verge of collapse - at which time it firmly rejected communism dogma for capitalism Realpolitik.

Now the writer does later state that the economy is booming due to a mix of Marxism and Adam Smith - but it is clear that this writer wouldn’t know Marxism (or Adam Smith) if he fell over it (or him). But I guess, since the current dictators of Vietnam call themselves communists - as they enrich themselves as one of the most corrupt governments in the world - ergo, then this must be a Marxist government with Marxist economic policies!

Scary - huh?

The truth is that Vietnam is run by a group of thugs who rake in millions from the free market capitalists who are enriching the government with zero, repeat – zero application of Marxist economics.

Obviously, this writer has no working knowledge of economics or Marxism and he clearly has no knowledge of how the Vietnamese economy is working, despite all his years spent there. It is also clear that this article has very little to do with the how and why of Vietnam today, but has everything to do with the writer trying to justify the communist dictatorship that has resulted in the deaths of so many millions of people.

Plus this writer also ignores that reality that this dictatorship has had to abandon all their ideas and the theories (other than of giving zero power to the people, and all power to themselves) after every aspect of communism proved to be so disastrous that they had to reinstitute the free market economy that had existed before they so brutally conquered South Vietnam.

Excuse me, I mean in proper, Orwellian (AKA - LA TIMES) Newspeak, before they ‘reunited’ the country, much as Hitler 'reunited' Germany and Austria. The communists won the battles, but they ended up losing the real war as they had to repudiate every one of their principles to be able to stay in power, which is all that they are really interested in. But this is something that neither this writer nor the LA Times can afford to admit.

The media simply refuses to concede that the current despots of Vietnam caused millions of people to die to put themselves into power and to install an economic and social system - that they have now abandoned, other than their remaining as absolute dictators.

And guess what - the writer can not find even one person in all of Vietnam who can say anything bad about this communist enslavement of South Vietnam! Not one! But guess what - that was not the story that this writer was looking for!! And, remember - only facts that serve a higher purpose can be admitted into the pages of the LA Times!

It is also clear that there is nobody at the LA Times who actually reads any of this garbage before it gets spewed into print. Or at least - no one who actually knows (or - far more damning - cares) a damn thing about economics, Adam Smith, Marxism - or much of anything else.

No one with any knowledge of any of those subjects could have allowed this article to be printed - particularly with such a totally dishonest headline.

In fact, if I were the editor of the LA Times, I would ask the reporter in question – and whoever edited this train wreck of a story - to write an essay on how Marxist economic theory is being utilized in the current economic boom in Vietnam. As someone who has actually plowed through Das Kapital, I can tell you this would be a very, very short essay.

Now compare the 'firmly communist country' and all the LA Times Marxist economics horseshit with the New York Times description:

"To the eyes of visitors here, including international journalists gathered for a reunion, the market economy and capitalism seem to be doing just fine in Ho Chi Minh City, formerly Saigon."

And as for the ‘social freedom’ crap – this is an iron fisted dictatorship that brooks no dissent, which the writer eventually, most reluctantly, admits towards the end of the story, far from the front page, where few readers will ever tread.

But since this is a communist dictatorship - then that makes it OK for the LA Times! No elections? Great! No free press? Wonderfull! No freedom of expression? Fine with the LA Times as long as there is plenty of Marxist 'social freedom' to go around!

May 2nd Update!

The not so hidden agenda of this article is encapsulated in the below quote:

"Ironically, if you took away the still-ruling Communist Party and discounted the perilous decade after the war, the Vietnam of today is not much different from the country U.S. policymakers wanted to create in the 1960s."

So, all those who were opposed to the spread of communism in the 1960's and the 1970's were wrong - because Vietnam ended up embracing capitalism! Minor details such as the millions killed by the ruling 'communist' government's invasion of South Vietnam and the countless numbers who starved to death or who were tortured during the decade after the war, not to mention the hundreds of thousands who risked - and often lost - their lives in search of freedom from the present ruling dictatorship - are just minor footnotes in history. Long live Marxist social freedoms!

(This has been a NOT paid for Ad for the Communist Part of Vietnam but the opinions expressed in it do represent the views of the LA Times' editorial board)


http://www.bigpicweblog.com/exp/index.php/weblog/communist_vietnam_has_a_flourishing_economy/

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-vietnamese1may01,1,4198142.story

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/01/international/asia/01saigon.html

When It Comes To Supporting Our Troops And Telling The Truth - Or Covering Up The Lies Of An Italian Journalist - Guess What The LA Times Does??

When blogger Patterico first broke the news on Saturday that the LA Times edited a Reuters wire story to REMOVE proof that American troops were telling the truth about what happened when an Italian agent was shot and killed in Iraq, I hoped it was just an errror on the part of the LA Times. I did not want to believe that a conscious effort was made to censor evidence that our soldiers were telling the truth thus proving that an Italian journalist was lying.

There can no longer be any hope that is the case. Today - as Patterico shows...

http://patterico.com/2005/05/01/2939/its-no-accident-la-times-editors-have-done-it-again/

.... in a follow-up story also credited to Reuters, the LA Times today again omits the fact that a satelitte photo shows that the car was speeding when it reached the checkpoint as the solidiers said but the Italian journalist denied.

Two days in a row, a conscious effort was made to alter the wire story to remove the proof that supports what our soldiers did. And this totally baffled me. I mean, even at its most biased, I can not imagine why the LA Times would go out of their way to demean our soldiers in combat, until I realized the only possible reason.

By NOT printing the story proving the Italian journalist was lying and that our troops were telling the truth, the LA Times is protecting a fellow journalist from being exposed as a liar.

Now it is one thing for the Times to lie to protect its own writers - as it has done in the past - but to print false changes about our soldiers to protect an Italian journalist - would seem to be beneath even the standards of the LA Times. But as of right now, I can think of no other reason why the LA Times would have done what it has now done for two straight days.

I await the Monday edition to see what they have to say.

Need To Know The Truth? Read Al-Jazeera And The Offical Iran News Agency - And Not The LA Times!

To recap, in the Saturday LA Times an article was printed about the investigation regarding the shooting of an Italian agent at a checkpoint in Iraq. The article was labeled as coming from Reuters and described the differences between the Italian and the American versions, primarily whether or not the car was going 30 or 60 miles an hour when it hit the checkpoint.

The key point, though, was that Reuters said that CBS had reported that a satellite photo had supposedly proven that the car was going 60 miles an hour when it ran the checkpoint. But... the LA Times DROPPED that paragraph and did not report the evidence supporting our troops. See below post for the link to the original story. And now, blogger Patterico reports, that both Al-Jazeera and the official news agency of Iran have printed the same release and mentioned the CBS report of the photos, though the Iran news agency questioned the accuracy of the photo.

But, for whatever reason, the LA Times doesn’t seem to believe that evidence supporting this country is deemed fit to print in their paper.


http://patterico.com/2005/04/30/2937/al-jazeera-fairer-than-the-ila-timesi/

Saturday, April 30, 2005

Did The LA Times - Essentially - Censor A Key Point In A Major International Story?

http://patterico.com/2005/04/30/2934/ilos-angeles-timesi-editors-edit-reuters-story-to-remove-critical-facts-supporting-us-position/

There is nothing I can add to the above story. Just read it. But if it is true that the Los Angeles Times rewrote and edited wire copy on a major international event to totally omit the proof supporting the American military, the only question is who needs to be fired. This is so serious, I hope the LA Times has a reasonable explanation. It is simply unthinkable that anyone at any American newspaper could have done this to our troops.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

LA Times Finally Discovers Location Of Hancock Park! Should We All Chip In And Buy All The Out-Of-Staters At The LAT -- Thomas Guides?

On second thought, since almost everyone at the LA Times is NOT from LA - buying a Thomas Guide for each of them would be beyond the financial resources of anyone other than... Eli Broad. See today's correction of the day:

April 28th

Rosenheim mansion — The Home of the Week column in the April 24 Real Estate section said the 1904 mansion that architect Alfred F. Rosenheim designed for himself was in Hancock Park. The house is in the Country Club Park neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Now since I spotted this error on Saturday April 23rd (and posted it on that day)- why should it take five days for the LA Times to correct such an obvious error?

And how many more days will it take for the LA Times to correct the statement by Mike Davis that the San Francisco housing market has 'burst'?

Wednesday, April 27, 2005

Why Do John P. Puerner, John S. Carroll, Dean Baquet, & Michael Kinsley All Support Nick Goldberg & Mike Davis In Lying To Readers Of The LA Times?

On April 19th - over a week ago, Mike Davis wrote a column approved by editor Nick Goldberg in which Davis stated that the San Francisco housing bubble had 'burst'. Now it is one thing to say that there is a housing bubble in San Francisco - that is an opinion. It is another thing to say that you believe that there is a bubble and to then predict that it will burst or is about to burst - and that too is an opinion.

But to say that the San Francisco housing market has burst - at a time when prices and sales are hitting record heights every month - is a lie, not an opinion. A lie that had been exposed repeatedly in my previous posts - and equally exposed by links in the LA Times' own real estate section.

But instead of a retraction and a correction (and an apology) - all that there has been forthcoming from the Times is... silence. A silence from the very highest levels of the LA Times that tells everyone in this city that the LA Times and its Publisher and its Editor approve of its writers lying and equally approve of its editors covering up those lies.

But, as anyone who regularly reads the LA Times knows, this should not be news to anyone.

Monday, April 25, 2005

Martini Republic, Marc Cooper, Mike Davis And That Most Elusive Of All Commodities - The Truth!!

I am not certain how the blogging war between LA Weekly writer & blogger Marc Cooper and the staff at the Martini Republic blog started (and seeing two sets of left-wingers trash each other would normally never cause me any grief), and even though Marc Cooper has been acting a bit like a spoiled child in the exchange, the Martini Republic's attack on Marc's credentials have gone a bit far.

So let me defend.... the indefensible. But before I go into my defense of Marc Cooper's credentials - let me give you my history with him. When NEW TIMES did a favorable article about my exposure of Mike Davis as a fraud, Marc called me up for an interview. And despite the fact that not one, but two other writers at NEW TIMES called me to say he was going to do a hit on me no matter what I said, I did the interview.

I also offered to meet Marc and show him a few hundred examples of how I could prove that Mike Davis had knowingly lied, but he refused to do that. I also offered to send or fax him the proof, but he also refused to allow me to do that, too. He said it was not going to be that kind of article - and he was right.

After we had a short and highly entertaining phone chat (he also refused to meet me in person) largely about our mutual childhoods in LA - and all the things we had in common, he printed a largely fabricated account of our conversation - including having me use words in contexts that I had never, ever in used in my life, much less used when I had talked with him. He also did not challenge a single fact that I had said was wrong about Mike Davis, but he did liberally go into personal attacks on my character, since he could not prove that anything I said was wrong.

However, other than when he is defending a friend such as Mike Davis - in which case Marc has zero compunction about lying - I find him to be one of the best - and most reliable political commentators writing in LA today.

So even though I am on the opposite side of the fence from him politically in many but not all ways, I find his LA Weekly columns on the state of the Republican and Democratic parties in California to be brutally honest and exceptionally insightful.

As always, my main concern is about one thing and one thing only when it comes to writing - the truth. And I always love to read points of view that differ from my own; my only problem is with people like Mike Davis who constantly and knowingly lie to support those points of view and papers like the LA Times who refuse to correct those lies.

Blind Squirrel Finds Nut! Davis Shaw Gets Something Right!!

In his Sunday LA Times column, Davis Shaw - correctly - finds fault with the lynching atmosphere that surrounds Mitch Albom's reporting what happened at a basketball game several days before the game actually took place. Compared with the amount of dishonest reporting that newspapers are filled with today - this is not a hanging offense.

http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/cl-ca-shaw24apr24,1,5268324.column?coll=la-news-columns&ctrack=1&cset=true

Now if Mr. Shaw can only do a follow-up column on the reaction to his piece on how he and the LA Times are the true Gods of accuracy and bloggers are fact-mangling scum...

And, oh, by the way -- the four layers of editors and filters have - so far - missed two errors in the Times' coverage of Mitch Albom prior to their being printed. Those corrections are now on their corrections page.

Sunday, April 24, 2005

LA Times Link Shows San Francisco Area Housing Prices Set All Time Price Record! But LA Times Still REFUSES To Correct Mike Davis!!

It is now Sunday and it has been almost one week since the LA Times' four layers of editors and filters gave their stamp of approval to Mike Davis saying that the real estate market in San Francsico has... 'burst'. And the LA Times still refuses to admit that Mike Davis simply... made that claim up... without there being any reality or basis for that ... preverication. Now today - the LAT Sunday real estate section links to a DataQuick story which shows that the entire Bay area real estate market - and not just the City - is not only still climbing, but that it shows no signs of any weakness of any kind!

Bay Area Home Sales: Record Prices, Near-Record Sales

La Jolla, CA.----Home prices in the Bay Area rose to new highs in March as sales for that month were at their highest level in sixteen years, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 11,310 new and resale houses and condos were sold in the nine-county region in March. That was up 51.5 percent from 7,463 for the previous month, and up 2.7 percent from 11,015 for March last year, according to DataQuick Information Systems.

Sales always increase from February to March. Last month's sales count was the highest for any March since 11,442 homes were sold in March 1989.

"Demand still appears to be stronger than supply, which puts upward pressure on prices. People seem to be increasingly willing to let the homes they live in represent a higher portion of their net worth. I suppose parking wealth in real estate is more attractive than investing in the stock market," said Marshall Prentice, DataQuick president.

The median price paid for a Bay Area home was $568,000, a new record. That was up 3.5 percent from $549,000 in February, and up 19.8 percent from $474,000 for March a year ago.

Prices are going up at their fastest pace in four years.

DataQuick, a subsidiary of Vancouver-based MacDonald Dettwiler and Associates, monitors real estate activity nationwide and provides information to consumers, educational institutions, public agencies, lending institutions, title companies and industry analysts.

The typical monthly mortgage payment that Bay Area buyers committed themselves to paying was $2,566 in March, an all-time high. A year ago it was $2,052.

Indicators of market distress are still largely absent. Foreclosure rates are low, down payment sizes are stable and there have been no significant shifts in market mix, DataQuick reported.


http://www.dqnews.com/